Easy Access Rules for Air Operations

ED Decision 2014/015/R

GENERAL

For the purpose of AMC2 CAT.IDE.H.190(b), a sensor is considered ‘readily available’ when it is already available or can be easily incorporated.

Regulation (EU) 2019/1387

(a)Turbine-engined helicopters with an MCTOM of 2 250 kg or more shall be equipped with a flight recorder if all of the following conditions are met:

(1)they are not within the scope of point CAT.IDE.H.190(a);

(2)they are first issued with an individual CofA on or after 5 September 2022.

(b)The flight recorder shall record, by means of flight data or images, information that is sufficient to determine the flight path and aircraft speed.

(c)The flight recorder shall be capable of retaining the flight data and the images recorded during at least the preceding 5 hours.

(d)The flight recorder shall automatically start to record prior to the helicopter being capable of moving under its own power and shall stop automatically after the helicopter is no longer capable of moving under its own power.

(e)If the flight recorder records images or audio of the flight crew compartment, then a function shall be provided which can be operated by the commander and which modifies image and audio recordings made before the operation of that function, so that those recordings cannot be retrieved using normal replay or copying techniques.

ED Decision 2021/005/R

OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS

(a)If the flight recorder records flight data, it should record at least the following parameters:

(1)relative time count,

(2)pitch attitude or pitch rate,

(3)roll attitude or roll rate,

(4)heading (magnetic or true) or yaw rate,

(5)latitude,

(6)longitude,

(7)positioning system: estimated error (if available),

(8)pressure altitude or altitude from a positioning system,

(9)time,

(10)ground speed,

(11)positioning system: track (if available),

(12)normal acceleration,

(13)longitudinal acceleration, and

(14)lateral acceleration.

(b)If the flight recorder records images, it should capture views of the main instrument displays at the pilot station, or at both pilot stations when the helicopter is certified for operation with a minimum crew of two pilots. The recorded image quality should allow reading the following indications during most of the flight:

(1)magnetic or true heading,

(2)time (if presented on the front instrument panel),

(3)pressure altitude,

(4)indicated airspeed,

(5)vertical speed,

(6)slip,

(7)OAT,

(8)attitude (if displayed),

(9)stabilised heading (if displayed), and

(10) main rotor speed.

(c)If the flight recorder records a combination of images and flight data, each flight parameter listed in (a) should be recorded as flight data or by means of images.

(d)The flight parameters listed in (a), which are recorded as flight data, should meet the performance specifications (range, sampling intervals, accuracy limits and resolution in read-out) as defined in the relevant table of EUROCAE Document ED-112 ‘Minimum Operational Performance Specification for Crash Protected Airborne Recorder Systems’, dated March 2003, or EUROCAE Document ED-155 ‘Minimum Operational Performance Specification for Lightweight Flight Recording Systems’, dated July 2009, or any later equivalent standard accepted by EASA.

(e)The operational performance requirements for the flight recorder should be those laid down in:

(1)EUROCAE Document ED-155 or any later equivalent standard accepted by EASA for lightweight flight recorders; or

(2)EUROCAE Document ED-112 or any later equivalent standard accepted by EASA for crash-protected flight recorders.

ED Decision 2021/005/R

ADDITIONAL USEFUL INFORMATION

Refer to GM1 CAT.IDE.A.191.

ED Decision 2021/005/R

INSTALLATION OF CAMERAS

Refer to GM2 CAT.IDE.A.191.

ED Decision 2021/005/R

RECORDING ACCURACY OF ATTITUDE RATE PARAMETERS

Refer to GM3 CAT.IDE.A.191.

ED Decision 2021/005/R

FUNCTION TO MODIFY IMAGE AND AUDIO RECORDINGS

Refer to GM1 CAT.IDE.A.191(e).

Regulation (EU) 2015/2338

(a)Helicopters first issued with an individual CofA on or after 8 April 2014 that have the capability to operate data link communications and are required to be equipped with a CVR, shall record on a recorder, where applicable:

(1)data link communication messages related to ATS communications to and from the helicopter, including messages applying to the following applications:

(i)data link initiation;

(ii)controller-pilot communication;

(iii)addressed surveillance;

(iv)flight information;

(v)as far as is practicable, given the architecture of the system, aircraft broadcast surveillance;

(vi)as far as is practicable, given the architecture of the system, aircraft operational control data;

(vii)as far as is practicable, given the architecture of the system, graphics;

(2)information that enables correlation to any associated records related to data link communications and stored separately from the helicopter; and

(3)information on the time and priority of data link communications messages, taking into account the system’s architecture.

(b)The recorder shall use a digital method of recording and storing data and information and a method of readily retrieving that data shall be available. The recording method shall allow the data to match the data recorded on the ground.

(c)The recorder shall be capable of retaining data recorded for at least the same duration as set out for CVRs in CAT.IDE.H.185.

(d)If the recorder is not deployable, it shall have a device to assist in locating it under water. By 1 January 2020 at the latest, this device shall have a minimum underwater transmission time of 90 days. If the recorder is deployable, it shall have an automatic emergency locator transmitter.

(e)The requirements applicable to the start and stop logic of the recorder are the same as the requirements applicable to the start and stop logic of the CVR contained in CAT.IDE.H.185(d) and (e).

ED Decision 2014/015/R

GENERAL

(a)The helicopter should be capable of recording the messages as specified in this AMC.

(b)As a means of compliance with CAT.IDE.H.195(a), the recorder on which the data link messages are recorded may be:

(1)the CVR;

(2)the FDR;

(3)a combination recorder when is applicable; or

(4)a dedicated flight recorder. In that case, the operational performance requirements for this recorder should be those laid down in EUROCAE Document ED-112 (Minimum Operational Performance Specification for Crash Protected Airborne Recorder Systems) dated March 2003, including amendments No 1 and No 2, or any later equivalent standard produced by EUROCAE.

(c)As a means of compliance with CAT.IDE.H.195(a)(2), the operator should enable correlation by providing information that allows an accident investigator to understand what data were provided to the helicopter and, when the provider identification is contained in the message, by which provider.

(d)The timing information associated with the data link communications messages required to be recorded by CAT.IDE.H.195(a)(3) should be capable of being determined from the airborne-based recordings. This timing information should include at least the following:

(1)the time each message was generated;

(2)the time any message was available to be displayed by the crew;

(3)the time each message was actually displayed or recalled from a queue; and

(4)the time of each status change.

(e)The message priority should be recorded when it is defined by the protocol of the data link communication message being recorded.

(f)The expression ‘taking into account the system architecture’, in CAT.IDE.H.195(a)(3) means that the recording of the specified information may be omitted if the existing source systems involved would require a major upgrade. The following should be considered:

(1)the extent of the modification required;

(2)the down-time period; and

(3)equipment software development.

(g)The intention is that new designs of source systems should include this functionality and support the full recording of the required information.

(h)Data link communications messages that support the applications in Table 1 below should be recorded.

(i)Further details on the recording requirements can be found in the recording requirement matrix in Appendix D.2 of EUROCAE Document ED-93 (Minimum Aviation System Performance Specification for CNS/ATM Recorder Systems, dated November 1998).

Table 1

Applications

ED Decision 2014/015/R

DEFINITIONS AND ACRONYMS

(a)The letters and expressions in Table 1 of AMC1 CAT.IDE.H.195 have the following meaning:

C:Complete contents recorded

M:Information that enables correlation with any associated records stored separately from the helicopter.

*:Applications that are to be recorded only as far as is practicable, given the architecture of the system.

F1:Graphics applications may be considered as AOC data when they are part of a data link communications application service run on an individual basis by the operator itself in the framework of the operational control.

F2:Where parametric data sent by the helicopter, such as Mode S, is reported within the message, it should be recorded unless data from the same source is recorded on the FDR.

(b)The definitions of the applications type in Table 1 of AMC1 CAT.IDE.H.195 are described in Table 1 below.

Table 1

Descriptions of the applications type

AACaeronautical administrative communications

ADS-Bautomatic dependent surveillance — broadcast

ADS-C automatic dependent surveillance — contract

AFNaircraft flight notification

AOCaeronautical operational control

ATISautomatic terminal information service

ATSCair traffic service communication

CAPcontroller access parameters

CPDLCcontroller pilot data link communications

CMconfiguration/context management

D-ATISdata link ATIS

D-FISdata link flight information service

DCLdeparture clearance

FANSFuture Air Navigation System

FLIPCYflight plan consistency

OCLoceanic clearance

SAPsystem access parameters

TWIPterminal weather information for pilots

ED Decision 2014/015/R

APPLICABILITY OF THE DATA LINK RECORDING REQUIREMENT

(a)If it is certain that the helicopter cannot use data link communication messages for ATS communications corresponding to any application designated by CAT.IDE.H.195(a)(1) then the data link recording requirement does not apply.

(b)Examples where the helicopter cannot use data link communication messages for ATS communications include but are not limited to the cases where:

(1)the helicopter data link communication capability is disabled permanently and in a way that it cannot be enabled again during the flight;

(2)data link communications are not used to support air traffic service (ATS) in the area of operation of the helicopter; and

(3)the helicopter data link communication equipment cannot communicate with the equipment used by ATS in the area of operation of the helicopter.

Regulation (EU) No 965/2012

Compliance with CVR and FDR requirements may be achieved by the carriage of one combination recorder.

ED Decision 2014/015/R

GENERAL

(a)A flight data and cockpit voice combination recorder is a flight recorder that records:

(1)all voice communications and the aural environment required by CAT.IDE.H.185 regarding CVRs; and

(2)all parameters required by CAT.IDE.H.190 regarding FDRs, with the same specifications required by those paragraphs.

(b)In addition, a flight data and cockpit voice combination recorder may record data link communication messages and related information required by CAT.IDE.H.195.

Regulation (EU) No 965/2012

(a)Helicopters shall be equipped with:

(1)a seat or berth for each person on board who is aged 24 months or more;

(2)a seat belt on each passenger seat and restraining belts for each berth;

(3)for helicopters first issued with an individual CofA on or after 1 August 1999, a safety belt with upper torso restraint system for use on each passenger seat for each passenger aged 24 months or more;

(4)a child restraint device (CRD) for each person on board younger than 24 months;

(5)a seat belt with upper torso restraint system incorporating a device that will automatically restrain the occupant’s torso in the event of rapid deceleration on each flight crew seat;

(6)a seat belt with upper torso restraint system on each seat for the minimum required cabin crew.

(b)A seat belt with upper torso restraint system shall:

(1)have a single point release; and

(2)on flight crew seats and on the seats for the minimum required cabin crew include two shoulder straps and a seat belt that may be used independently.

ED Decision 2019/019/R

CHILD RESTRAINT DEVICES (CRDs)

(a)A CRD is considered to be acceptable if:

(1)it is a ‘supplementary loop belt’ manufactured with the same techniques and the same materials of the approved safety belts; or

(2)it complies with (b).

(b)Provided the CRD can be installed properly on the respective helicopter seat, the following CRDs are considered acceptable:

(1)CRDs approved for use in aircraft according to the European Technical Standard Order ETSO-C100c on Aviation Child Safety Device (ACSD);

(2)CRDs approved by EASA through a Type Certificate or Supplemental Type Certificate;

(3)Child seats approved for use in motor vehicles on the basis of the technical standard specified in point (i) below. The child seats must be also approved for use in aircraft on the basis of the technical standard specified in either point (ii) or point (iii):

(i)UN Standard ECE R44-04 (or 03), or ECE R129 bearing the respective ‘ECE R’ label; and

(ii) German ‘Qualification Procedure for Child Restraint Systems for Use in Aircraft’ (TÜV Doc.: TÜV/958-01/2001) bearing the label ‘For Use in Aircraft’; or

(iii) Other technical standard acceptable to the competent authority. The child seat should hold a qualification sign that it can be used in aircraft.

(4)Child seats approved for use in motor vehicles and aircraft according to Canadian CMVSS 213/213.1 bearing the respective label;

(5)Child seats approved for use in motor vehicles and aircraft according to US FMVSS No 213 and bearing one or two labels displaying the following two sentences:

(i)‘THIS CHILD RESTRAINT SYSTEM CONFORMS TO ALL APPLICABLE FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARDS’; and

(ii)in red letters ‘THIS RESTRAINT IS CERTIFIED FOR USE IN MOTOR VEHICLES AND AIRCRAFT’;

(6)Child seat approved for use in motor vehicles and aircraft according to Australia/New Zealand’s technical standard AS/NZS 1754:2013 bearing the green part on the label displaying ‘For Use in Aircraft’; and

(7)CRDs manufactured and tested according to other technical standards equivalent to those listed above. The device should be marked with an associated qualification sign, which shows the name of the qualification organisation and a specific identification number, related to the associated qualification project. The qualifying organisation should be a competent and independent organisation that is acceptable to the competent authority.

(c)Location

(1)Forward-facing child seats may be installed on both forward-and rearward-facing passenger seats, but only when fitted in the same direction as the passenger seat on which they are positioned. Rearward-facing child seats should only be installed on forward-facing passenger seats. A child seat should not be installed within the radius of action of an airbag unless it is obvious that the airbag is de-activated or it can be demonstrated that there is no negative impact from the airbag.

(2)An infant/child in a CRD should be located in the vicinity of a floor level exit.

(3)An infant/child in a CRD should not hinder evacuation for any passenger.

(4)An infant/child in a CRD should neither be located in the row (where rows are existing) leading to an emergency exit nor located in a row immediately forward or aft of an emergency exit. A window passenger seat is the preferred location. An aisle passenger seat or a cross aisle passenger seat that forms part of the evacuation route to exits is not recommended. Other locations may be acceptable provided the access of neighbour passengers to the nearest aisle is not obstructed by the CRD.

(5)In general, only one CRD per row segment is recommended. More than one CRD per row segment is allowed if the infants/children are from the same family or travelling group provided the infants/children are accompanied by a responsible adult sitting next to them in the same row segment.

(6)A row segment is one or more seats side-by-side separated from the next row segment by an aisle.

(d)Installation

(1)CRDs tested and approved for use in aircraft should only be installed on a suitable passenger seat by the method shown in the manufacturer’s instructions provided with each CRD and with the type of connecting device they are approved for the installation in aircraft. CRDs designed to be installed only by means of rigid bar lower anchorages (ISOFIX or equivalent) should only be used on passenger seats equipped with such connecting devices and should not be secured by passenger seat lap belt.

(2)All safety and installation instructions must be followed carefully by the responsible person accompanying the infant/child. Operators should prohibit the use of a CRD not installed on the passenger seat according to the manufacturer's instructions or not approved for use in aircraft.

(3)If a forward-facing child seat with a rigid backrest is to be fastened by a seat lap belt, the restraint device should be fastened when the backrest of the passenger seat on which it rests is in a reclined position. Thereafter, the backrest is to be positioned upright. This procedure ensures better tightening of the child seat on the aircraft seat if the aircraft seat is reclinable.

(4)The buckle of the adult safety belt must be easily accessible for both opening and closing, and must be in line with the seat belt halves (not canted) after tightening.

(5)Forward facing restraint devices with an integral harness must not be installed such that the adult safety belt is secured over the infant.

(e)Operation

(1)Each CRD should remain secured to a passenger seat during all phases of flight unless it is properly stowed when not in use.

(2)Where a child seat is adjustable in recline, it must be in an upright position for all occasions when passenger restraint devices are required.

ED Decision 2014/015/R

UPPER TORSO RESTRAINT SYSTEM

An upper torso restraint system having two shoulder straps and additional straps is deemed to be compliant with the requirement for restraint systems with two shoulder straps.

SEAT BELT

A seat belt with a diagonal shoulder strap (three anchorage points) is deemed to be compliant with the requirement for a seat belt (two anchorage points).

ED Decision 2014/015/R

SEATS FOR MINIMUM REQUIRED CABIN CREW

(a)Seats for the minimum required cabin crew members should be located near required floor level emergency exits, except if the emergency evacuation of passengers would be enhanced by seating the cabin crew members elsewhere. In this case, other locations are acceptable. This criterion should also apply if the number of required cabin crew members exceeds the number of floor level emergency exits.

(b)Seats for cabin crew member(s) should be forward or rearward facing within 15° of the longitudinal axis of the helicopter.

Regulation (EU) No 965/2012

Helicopters in which not all passenger seats are visible from the flight crew seat(s) shall be equipped with a means of indicating to all passengers and cabin crew when seat belts shall be fastened and when smoking is not allowed.

Regulation (EU) No 965/2012

(a)Helicopters shall be equipped with at least one first-aid kit.

(b)First-aid kits shall be:

(1)readily accessible for use;

(2)kept up to date.

ED Decision 2021/005/R

CONTENT OF FIRST-AID KITS

(a)First-aid kits should be equipped with appropriate and sufficient medications and instrumentation. However, these kits should be supplemented by the operator according to the characteristics of the operation (scope of operation, flight duration, number and demographics of passengers, etc.).

(b)The following should be included in the first-aid kit:

(1)Equipment

(i)bandages (assorted sizes, including a triangular bandage);

(ii)burns dressings (unspecified);

(iii)wound dressings (large and small);

(iv)adhesive dressings (assorted sizes);

(v)adhesive tape;

(vi)adhesive wound closures;

(vii)safety pins;

(viii)safety scissors;

(ix)antiseptic wound cleaner;

(x)disposable resuscitation aid;

(xi)disposable gloves;

(xii)tweezers: splinter;

(xiii)thermometers (non-mercury); and

(xiv)surgical masks.

(2)Medications

(i)simple analgesic (including paediatric form — if the type of operation does not include transport of children or infants, the paediatric form may not be included);

(ii)antiemetic — non-injectable;

(iii)nasal decongestant;

(iv)gastrointestinal antacid, in the case of helicopters carrying more than 9 passengers;

(v)anti-diarrhoeal medication in the case of helicopters carrying more than 9 passengers; and

(vi)antihistamine (including paediatric form – if the type of operation does not include transport of children or infants, the paediatric form may not be included).

(3)Other content. The operator should make the instructions readily available. If an electronic format is available, then all instructions should be kept on the same device. If a paper format is used, then the instructions should be kept in the same kit with the applicable equipment and medication. The instructions should include, as a minimum, the following:

(i)a list of contents in at least two languages (English and one other). This should include information on the effects and side effects of medications carried;

(ii)first-aid handbook, current edition;

(iii)Basic life support instructions cards (summarising and depicting the current algorithm for basic life support); and

(iv)medical incident report form.

(4)Additional equipment. The following additional equipment should be carried on board each aircraft equipped with a first-aid kit, though not necessarily in the first-aid kit. The additional equipment should include, as a minimum:

(i)automated external defibrillator (AED) on all aircraft required to carry at least one cabin crew;

(ii)bag-valve masks (masks in three sizes: one for adults, one for children, and one for infants). If the type of operation does not include transport of children or infants, those sizes of bag-valve masks may not be included;

(iii)suitable airway management device (e.g. supraglottic airway devices, oropharyngeal or nasopharyngeal airways);

(iv)eye irrigator; and

(v)biohazard disposal bags.

(5)For HEMS operations, where the content of the first-aid kit is included in the medical equipment carried on board, the first-aid kit as described above is no longer required.

ED Decision 2014/015/R

MAINTENANCE OF FIRST-AID KITS

To be kept up to date, first-aid kits should be:

(a)inspected periodically to confirm, to the extent possible, that contents are maintained in the condition necessary for their intended use;

(b)replenished at regular intervals, in accordance with instructions contained on their labels, or as circumstances warrant; and

(c)replenished after use-in-flight at the first opportunity where replacement items are available.

ED Decision 2021/005/R

LOCATION AND USE

The location of the first-aid kit is normally indicated using internationally recognisable signs.

The first-aid kit ‘should be readily accessible for use’ in helicopter operations should be understood as the first-aid kit being either accessible in flight or immediately after landing.

In some operations, it is not practicable to use the first-aid kit during flight. Therefore, the first-aid kit can be carried in the cargo compartment, where it will be easily accessible for use as soon as the aircraft has landed, when the following conditions are met:

(a)precautionary landing sites are available;

(b)the lack of cabin space is such that movement or use of the first-aid kit is impaired; and

(c)the installation of the first-aid kit in the cabin is not practicable.

ED Decision 2021/005/R

STORAGE

As a best practise and wherever practicable, the emergency medical equipment listed under AMC1 CAT.IDE.H.220 should be kept close together.

ED Decision 2021/005/R

CONTENT OF FIRST-AID KITS

The operator may supplement first-aid kits according to the characteristics of the operation based on a risk assessment. The assessment does not require an approval by the competent authority.

ED Decision 2021/005/R

LITHIUM BATTERIES

Risks related to the presence of lithium batteries should be assessed. All equipment powered by lithium batteries carried on an aeroplane should comply with the provisions of AMC1 CAT.GEN.MPA.140(f) including applicable technical standards such as (E)TSO-C142.

Regulation (EU) No 965/2012

Non-pressurised helicopters operated at pressure altitudes above 10 000 ft shall be equipped with supplemental oxygen equipment capable of storing and dispensing the oxygen supplies in accordance with the following tables.

Table 1

Oxygen minimum requirements for complex non-pressurised helicopters

Table 2

Oxygen minimum requirements for other-than-complex non-pressurised helicopters

ED Decision 2014/015/R

DETERMINATION OF OXYGEN

The amount of supplemental oxygen for sustenance for a particular operation should be determined on the basis of flight altitudes and flight duration, consistent with the operating procedures, including emergency, procedures, established for each operation and the routes to be flown as specified in the operations manual.

ED Decision 2023/007/R

OXYGEN STORAGE AND DISPENSING EQUIPMENT

(a)Supplemental oxygen requirements may be met either by means of either installed or portable equipment.

(b)The use of oxygen dispensers should not prevent the crew from performing their intended tasks, including any radio communications.

(c)The oxygen-dispensing unit may consist of a nasal oxygen cannula.

Regulation (EU) No 965/2012

(a)Helicopters shall be equipped with at least one hand fire extinguisher in the flight crew compartment.

(b)At least one hand fire extinguisher shall be located in, or readily accessible for use in, each galley not located on the main passenger compartment.

(c)At least one hand fire extinguisher shall be available for use in each cargo compartment that is accessible to crew members in flight.

(d)The type and quantity of extinguishing agent for the required fire extinguishers shall be suitable for the type of fire likely to occur in the compartment where the extinguisher is intended to be used and to minimise the hazard of toxic gas concentration in compartments occupied by persons.

(e)The helicopter shall be equipped with at least a number of hand fire extinguishers in accordance with Table 1, conveniently located to provide adequate availability for use in each passenger compartment.

Table 1

Number of hand fire extinguishers

ED Decision 2014/015/R

NUMBER, LOCATION AND TYPE

(a)The number and location of hand fire extinguishers should be such as to provide adequate availability for use, account being taken of the number and size of the passenger compartments, the need to minimise the hazard of toxic gas concentrations and the location of lavatories, galleys, etc. These considerations may result in a number of fire extinguishers greater than the minimum required.

(b)There should be at least one hand fire extinguisher installed in the flight crew compartment and this should be suitable for fighting both flammable fluid and electrical equipment fires. Additional hand fire extinguishers may be required for the protection of other compartments accessible to the crew in flight. Dry chemical fire extinguishers should not be used in the flight crew compartment, or in any compartment not separated by a partition from the flight crew compartment, because of the adverse effect on vision during discharge and, if conductive, interference with electrical contacts by the chemical residues.

(c)Where only one hand fire extinguisher is required in the passenger compartments, it should be located near the cabin crew member’s station, where provided.

(d)Where two or more hand fire extinguishers are required in the passenger compartments and their location is not otherwise dictated by consideration of (a), an extinguisher should be located near each end of the cabin with the remainder distributed throughout the cabin as evenly as is practicable.

(e)Unless an extinguisher is clearly visible, its location should be indicated by a placard or sign. Appropriate symbols may also be used to supplement such a placard or sign.

Regulation (EU) No 965/2012

If areas of the helicopter’s fuselage suitable for break-in by rescue crews in an emergency are marked, such areas shall be marked as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1

ED Decision 2014/015/R

MARKINGS — COLOUR AND CORNERS

(a)The colour of the markings should be red or yellow and, if necessary, should be outlined in white to contrast with the background.

(b)If the corner markings are more than 2 m apart, intermediate lines 9 cm x 3 cm should be inserted so that there is no more than 2 m between adjacent markings.

Regulation (EU) No 965/2012

Helicopters with an MOPSC of more than 19 shall be equipped with one portable battery-powered megaphone readily accessible for use by crew members during an emergency evacuation.

ED Decision 2014/015/R

LOCATION OF MEGAPHONES

(a)The megaphone should be readily accessible at the assigned seat of a cabin crew member or crew members other than flight crew.

(b)This does not necessarily require megaphones to be positioned such that they can be physically reached by a crew member when strapped in a cabin crew member’s seat.

Regulation (EU) No 965/2012

(a)Helicopters with an MOPSC of more than 19 shall be equipped with:

(1)an emergency lighting system having an independent power supply to provide a source of general cabin illumination to facilitate the evacuation of the helicopter; and

(2)emergency exit marking and locating signs visible in daylight or in the dark.

(b)Helicopters shall be equipped with emergency exit markings visible in daylight or in the dark when operated:

(1)in performance class 1 or 2 on a flight over water at a distance from land corresponding to more than 10 minutes flying time at normal cruising speed;

(2)in performance class 3 on a flight over water at a distance corresponding to more than three minutes flying time at normal cruising speed.

Regulation (EU) No 965/2012

(a)Helicopters shall be equipped with at least one automatic ELT.

(b)An ELT of any type shall be capable of transmitting simultaneously on 121,5 MHz and 406 MHz.

ED Decision 2014/015/R

BATTERIES

(a)All batteries used in ELTs should be replaced (or recharged if the battery is rechargeable) when the equipment has been in use for more than 1 cumulative hour or in the following cases:

(1)Batteries specifically designed for use in ELTs and having an airworthiness release certificate (EASA Form 1 or equivalent) should be replaced (or recharged if the battery is rechargeable) before the end of their useful life in accordance with the maintenance instructions applicable to the ELT.

(2)Standard batteries manufactured in accordance with an industry standard and not having an airworthiness release certificate (EASA Form 1 or equivalent), when used in ELTs should be replaced (or recharged if the battery is rechargeable) when 50 % of their useful life (or for rechargeable, 50 % of their useful life of charge), as established by the battery manufacturer, has expired.

(3)The battery useful life (or useful life of charge) criteria in (1) and (2) do not apply to batteries (such as water-activated batteries) that are essentially unaffected during probable storage intervals.

(b)The new expiry date for a replaced (or recharged) battery should be legibly marked on the outside of the equipment.

ED Decision 2021/008/R

TYPES OF ELTs AND GENERAL TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS

(a)The ELT required by this provision should be one of the following:

(1)Automatic Fixed (ELT(AF)). An automatically activated ELT that is permanently attached to an aircraft and is designed to aid search and rescue (SAR) teams in locating the crash site.

(2)Automatic Portable (ELT(AP)). An automatically activated ELT, which is rigidly attached to an aircraft before a crash, but is readily removable from the aircraft after a crash. It functions as an ELT during the crash sequence. If the ELT does not employ an integral antenna, the aircraft-mounted antenna may be disconnected and an auxiliary antenna (stored in the ELT case) attached to the ELT. The ELT can be tethered to a survivor or a life-raft. This type of ELT is intended to aid SAR teams in locating the crash site or survivor(s).

(3)Automatic deployable (ELT(AD)). An ELT that is rigidly attached to the aircraft before the crash and that is automatically deployed and activated by an impact, and, in some cases, also by water sensors. This type of ELT should float in water and is intended to aid SAR teams in locating the crash site. The ELT(AD) may be either a stand-alone beacon or an inseparable part of a deployable recorder.

(b)To minimise the possibility of damage in the event of crash impact, the automatic ELT should be rigidly fixed to the aircraft structure, as far aft as is practicable, with its antenna and connections arranged so as to maximise the probability of the signal being transmitted after a crash.

(c)Any ELT carried should operate in accordance with the relevant provisions of ICAO Annex 10, Volume III Communications Systems and should be registered with the national agency responsible for initiating search and rescue or other nominated agency.

ED Decision 2021/008/R

TERMINOLOGY

(a)An ‘automatic ELT’ means an ELT(AF), ELT(AP), or ELT(AD). Other types of ELTs are not considered ‘automatic ELTs’.

(b)A ‘water sensor’ means a sensor that detects water immersion, including at low depth.

ED Decision 2021/008/R

ADDITIONAL GUIDANCE

(a)It is advisable to install automatic ELTs that transmit encoded position data and that meet the operational performance requirements of EUROCAE Document ED-62B, or RTCA DO-204B, or any later equivalent standard.

(b)Guidance material for the inspection of an ELT can be found in FAA Advisory Circular (AC) 91-44A ‘Installation and Inspection Procedures for Emergency Locator Transmitters and Receivers’, Change 1, dated February 2018.

Regulation (EU) No 965/2012

(a)Helicopters shall be equipped with a life-jacket for each person on board or equivalent floatation device for each person on board younger than 24 months, stowed in a position that is readily accessible from the seat or berth of the person for whose use it is provided, when operated in:

(1)performance class 1 or 2 on a flight over water at a distance from land corresponding to more than 10 minutes flying time at normal cruising speed;

(2)performance class 3 on a flight over water beyond autorotational distance from land;

(3)performance class 2 or 3 when taking off or landing at an aerodrome or operating site where the take-off or approach path is over water.

(b)Each life-jacket or equivalent individual flotation device shall be equipped with a means of electric illumination for the purpose of facilitating the location of persons.

ED Decision 2014/015/R

ACCESSIBILITY

The life-jacket should be accessible from the seat or berth of the person for whose use it is provided, with a safety belt or harness fastened.

ED Decision 2015/007/R

ELECTRIC ILLUMINATION

The means of electric illumination should be a survivor locator light as defined in the applicable ETSO issued by the Agency or equivalent.

ED Decision 2014/015/R

SEAT CUSHIONS

Seat cushions are not considered to be flotation devices.

Regulation (EU) 2016/1199

Each crew member shall wear a survival suit when operating in performance class 3 on a flight over water beyond autorotational distance or safe forced landing distance from land, when the weather report or forecasts available to the commander indicate that the sea temperature will be less than plus 10 °C during the flight.

ED Decision 2014/015/R

ESTIMATING SURVIVAL TIME

(a)Introduction

(1)A person accidentally immersed in cold seas (typically offshore Northern Europe) will have a better chance of survival if he/she is wearing an effective survival suit in addition to a life-jacket. By wearing the survival suit, he/she can slow down the rate which his/her body temperature falls and, consequently, protect himself/herself from the greater risk of drowning brought about by incapacitation due to hypothermia.

(2)The complete survival suit system – suit, life-jacket and clothes worn under the suit – should be able to keep the wearer alive long enough for the rescue services to find and recover him/her. In practice the limit is about 3 hours. If a group of persons in the water cannot be rescued within this time they are likely to have become so scattered and separated that location will be extremely difficult, especially in the rough water typical of Northern European sea areas. If it is expected that in water protection could be required for periods greater than 3 hours, improvements should, rather, be sought in the search and rescue procedures than in the immersion suit protection.

(b)Survival times

(1)The aim should be to ensure that a person in the water can survive long enough to be rescued, i.e. the survival time must be greater than the likely rescue time. The factors affecting both times are shown in Figure 1 below. The figure emphasises that survival time is influenced by many factors, physical and human. Some of the factors are relevant to survival in cold water and some are relevant to survival in water at any temperature.

Figure 1

The survival equation

(2)Broad estimates of likely survival times for the thin individual offshore are given in Table 1 below. As survival time is significantly affected by the prevailing weather conditions at the time of immersion, the Beaufort wind scale has been used as an indicator of these surface conditions.

Table 1

Timescale within which the most vulnerable individuals are likely to succumb to the prevailing conditions.

(3)Consideration should also be given to escaping from the helicopter itself should it submerge or invert in the water. In this case, escape time is limited to the length of time the occupants can hold their breath. The breath holding time can be greatly reduced by the effect of cold shock. Cold shock is caused by the sudden drop in skin temperature on immersion, and is characterised by a gasp reflex and uncontrolled breathing. The urge to breathe rapidly becomes overwhelming and, if still submerged, the individual will inhale water resulting in drowning. Delaying the onset of cold shock by wearing an immersion suit will extend the available escape time from a submerged helicopter.

(4)The effects of water leakage and hydrostatic compression on the insulation quality of clothing are well recognised. In a nominally dry system, the insulation is provided by still air trapped within the clothing fibres and between the layers of suit and clothes. It has been observed that many systems lose some of their insulative capacity either because the clothes under the 'waterproof' survival suit get wet to some extent or because of hydrostatic compression of the whole assembly. As a result of water leakage and compression, survival times will be shortened. The wearing of warm clothing under the suit is recommended.

(5)Whatever type of survival suit and other clothing is provided, it should not be forgotten that significant heat loss can occur from the head.

Regulation (EU) No 965/2012

Helicopters operated:

(a)in performance class 1 or 2 on a flight over water at a distance from land corresponding to more than 10 minutes flying time at normal cruising speed;

(b)in performance class 3 on a flight over water at a distance corresponding to more than three minutes flying time at normal cruising speed, shall be equipped with:

(1)in the case of a helicopter carrying less than 12 persons, at least one life-raft with a rated capacity of not less than the maximum number of persons on board, stowed so as to facilitate its ready use in an emergency;

(2)in the case of a helicopter carrying more than 11 persons, at least two life-rafts, stowed so as to facilitate their ready use in an emergency, sufficient together to accommodate all persons capable of being carried on board and, if one is lost, the remaining life-raft(s) having, the overload capacity sufficient to accommodate all persons on the helicopter;

(3)at least one survival ELT (ELT(S)) for each required life-raft; and

(4)life-saving equipment, including means of sustaining life, as appropriate to the flight to be undertaken.

ED Decision 2014/015/R

LIFE-RAFTS AND EQUIPMENT FOR MAKING DISTRESS SIGNALS – HELICOPTERS

(a)Each required life-raft should conform to the following specifications:

(1)be of an approved design and stowed so as to facilitate their ready use in an emergency;

(2)be radar conspicuous to standard airborne radar equipment;

(3)when carrying more than one life-raft on board, at least 50 % should be able to be deployed by the crew while seated at their normal station, where necessary by remote control; and

(4)life-rafts that are not deployable by remote control or by the crew should be of such weight as to permit handling by one person. 40 kg should be considered a maximum weight.

(b)Each required life-raft should contain at least the following:

(1)one approved survivor locator light;

(2)one approved visual signalling device;

(3)one canopy (for use as a sail, sunshade or rain catcher) or other mean to protect occupants from the elements;

(4)one radar reflector;

(5)one 20-m retaining line designed to hold the life-raft near the helicopter but to release it if the helicopter becomes totally submerged;

(6)one sea anchor;

(7)one survival kit, appropriately equipped for the route to be flown, which should contain at least the following:

(i)one life-raft repair kit;

(ii)one bailing bucket;

(iii)one signalling mirror;

(iv)one police whistle;

(v)one buoyant raft knife;

(vi)one supplementary means of inflation;

(vii)sea sickness tablets;

(viii)one first-aid kit;

(ix)one portable means of illumination;

(x)500 ml of pure water and one sea water desalting kit; and

(xi)one comprehensive illustrated survival booklet in an appropriate language.

ED Decision 2021/008/R

SURVIVAL ELT

(a)The survival ELT (ELT(S)) is an ELT removable from an aircraft, stowed so as to facilitate its ready use in an emergency, and manually activated by a survivor. An ELT(S) may be activated manually or automatically (e.g. by water activation). It should be designed to be tethered either to a life raft or a survivor.

(b)An ELT(AP) may be used to replace one required ELT(S) provided that it meets the ELT(S) requirements. A water-activated ELT(S) is not an ELT(AP).

Regulation (EU) No 965/2012

Helicopters operated over areas in which search and rescue would be especially difficult shall be equipped with:

(a)signalling equipment to make distress signals;

(b)at least one ELT(S); and

(c)additional survival equipment for the route to be flown taking account of the number of persons on board.

ED Decision 2014/015/R

ADDITIONAL SURVIVAL EQUIPMENT

(a)The following additional survival equipment should be carried when required:

(1)500 ml of water for each 4, or fraction of 4, persons on board;

(2)one knife;

(3)first-aid equipment; and

(4)one set of air/ground codes.

(b)In addition, when polar conditions are expected, the following should be carried:

(1)a means for melting snow;

(2)one snow shovel and 1 ice saw;

(3)sleeping bags for use by 1/3 of all persons on board and space blankets for the remainder or space blankets for all passengers on board; and

(4)one arctic/polar suit for each crew member.

(c)If any item of equipment contained in the above list is already carried on board the helicopter in accordance with another requirement, there is no need for this to be duplicated.

ED Decision 2021/008/R

SURVIVAL ELT

(a)The survival ELT (ELT(S)) is an ELT removable from an aircraft, stowed so as to facilitate its ready use in an emergency, and manually activated by a survivor. An ELT(S) may be activated manually or automatically (e.g. by water activation). It should be designed to be tethered either to a life raft or a survivor.

(b)An ELT(AP) may be used to replace one required ELT(S) provided that it meets the ELT(S) requirements. A water-activated ELT(S) is not an ELT(AP).

ED Decision 2014/015/R

SIGNALLING EQUIPMENT

The signalling equipment for making distress signals is described in ICAO Annex 2, Rules of the Air.

ED Decision 2014/015/R

AREAS IN WHICH SEARCH AND RESCUE WOULD BE ESPECIALLY DIFFICULT

The expression ‘areas in which search and rescue would be especially difficult’ should be interpreted, in this context, as meaning:

(a)areas so designated by the authority responsible for managing search and rescue; or

(b)areas that are largely uninhabited and where:

(1)the authority referred to in (a) has not published any information to confirm whether search and rescue would be or would not be especially difficult; and

(2)the authority referred to in (a) does not, as a matter of policy, designate areas as being especially difficult for search and rescue.

Regulation (EU) 2019/1384

Helicopters certified for operating on water shall be equipped with:

(a)a sea anchor and other equipment necessary to facilitate mooring, anchoring or manoeuvring the helicopter on water, appropriate to its size, mass and handling characteristics; and

(b)equipment for making the sound signals prescribed in the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, where applicable.

ED Decision 2014/015/R

INTERNATIONAL REGULATIONS FOR PREVENTING COLLISIONS AT SEA

International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea are those that were published by the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) in 1972.

Regulation (EU) 2019/1384

(a)Helicopters shall be designed for landing on water or certified for ditching in accordance with the relevant certification specification when operated in performance class 1 or 2 on a flight over water in a hostile environment at a distance from land corresponding to more than 10 minutes flying time at normal cruise speed.

(b)Helicopters shall be designed for landing on water or certified for ditching in accordance with the relevant certification specification or fitted with emergency flotation equipment when operated in:

(1)performance class 1 or 2 on a flight over water in a non-hostile environment at a distance from land corresponding to more than 10 minutes flying time at normal cruise speed;

(2)performance class 2, when taking off or landing over water, except in the case of helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) operations, where for the purpose of minimising exposure, the landing or take-off at a HEMS operating site located in a congested environment is conducted over water;

(3)performance class 3 on a flight over water beyond safe forced landing distance from land.

ED Decision 2016/022/R

DESIGN FOR LANDING ON WATER

A helicopter is designed for landing on water if safety provisions at least equivalent to those for ditching (CS 27.801/CS 29.801) are met.

ED Decision 2016/022/R

GENERAL

The same considerations of AMC1 SPA.HOFO.165(d) should apply in respect of emergency flotation equipment.

Regulation (EU) No 965/2012

Whenever a radio communication and/or radio navigation system is required, helicopters shall be equipped with a headset with boom microphone or equivalent and a transmit button on the flight controls for each required pilot and/or crew member at his/her assigned station.

ED Decision 2014/015/R

GENERAL

(a)A headset consists of a communication device that includes two earphones to receive and a microphone to transmit audio signals to the helicopter’s communication system. To comply with the minimum performance requirements, the earphones and microphone should match the communication system’s characteristics and the cockpit environment. The headset should be adequately adjustable in order to fit the pilot’s head. Headset boom microphones should be of the noise cancelling type.

(b)If the intention is to utilise noise cancelling earphones, the operator should ensure that the earphones do not attenuate any aural warnings or sounds necessary for alerting the flight crew on matters related to the safe operation of the helicopter.

ED Decision 2014/015/R

GENERAL

The term ‘headset’ includes any aviation helmet incorporating headphones and microphone worn by a flight crew member.

Regulation (EU) No 965/2012

(a)Helicopters shall be equipped with the radio communication equipment required by the applicable airspace requirements.

(b)The radio communication equipment shall provide for communication on the aeronautical emergency frequency 121,5 MHz.

Regulation (EU) No 965/2012

Helicopters operated under IFR shall be equipped with an audio selector panel operable from each required flight crew member station.

Regulation (EU) No 965/2012

Helicopters operated under VFR over routes that can be navigated by reference to visual landmarks shall be equipped with radio communication equipment necessary under normal radio propagation conditions to fulfil the following:

(a)communicate with appropriate ground stations;

(b)communicate with appropriate ATC stations from any point in controlled airspace within which flights are intended; and

(c)receive meteorological information.

Regulation (EU) 2019/1387

(a)Helicopters operated under IFR or under VFR over routes that cannot be navigated by reference to visual landmarks shall be equipped with radio communication, navigation and surveillance equipment in accordance with the applicable airspace requirements.

(b)Radio communication equipment shall include at least two independent radio communication systems necessary under normal operating conditions to communicate with an appropriate ground station from any point on the route, including diversions.

(c)Helicopters shall have sufficient navigation equipment to ensure that, in the event of the failure of one item of equipment at any stage of the flight, the remaining equipment shall allow safe navigation in accordance with the flight plan.

(d)Helicopters operated on flights in which it is intended to land in IMC shall be equipped with suitable equipment capable of providing guidance to a point from which a visual landing can be performed for each aerodrome at which it is intended to land in IMC and for any designated alternate aerodromes.

(e)For PBN operations the aircraft shall meet the airworthiness certification requirements for the appropriate navigation specification.

ED Decision 2014/015/R

TWO INDEPENDENT MEANS OF COMMUNICATION

Whenever two independent means of communication are required, each system should have an independent antenna installation, except where rigidly supported non-wire antennae or other antenna installations of equivalent reliability are used.

ED Decision 2014/015/R

ACCEPTABLE NUMBER AND TYPE OF COMMUNICATION AND NAVIGATION EQUIPMENT

(a)An acceptable number and type of communication and navigation equipment is:

(1)two VHF omnidirectional radio range (VOR) receiving systems on any route, or part thereof, where navigation is based only on VOR signals;

(2)two automatic direction finder (ADF) systems on any route, or part thereof, where navigation is based only on non-directional beacon (NDB) signals; and

(3)area navigation equipment when area navigation is required for the route being flown (e.g. equipment required by Part-SPA).

(b)The helicopter may be operated without the navigation equipment specified in (a)(1) and (a)(2) provided it is equipped with alternative equipment. The reliability and the accuracy of alternative equipment should allow safe navigation for the intended route.

(c)VHF communication equipment, instrument landing system (ILS) localiser and VOR receivers installed on helicopters to be operated under IFR should comply with the following FM immunity performance standards:

(1)ICAO Annex 10, Volume I – Radio Navigation Aids, and Volume III, Part II – Voice Communications Systems; and

(2)acceptable equipment standards contained in EUROCAE Minimum Operational Performance Specifications, documents ED-22B for VOR receivers, ED-23B for VHF communication receivers and ED-46B for LOC receivers and the corresponding Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics (RTCA) documents DO-186, DO-195 and DO-196.

ED Decision 2014/015/R

FAILURE OF A SINGLE UNIT

Required communication and navigation equipment should be installed such that the failure of any single unit required for either communication or navigation purposes, or both, will not result in the failure of another unit required for communications or navigation purposes.

ED Decision 2014/015/R

APPLICABLE AIRSPACE REQUIREMENTS

For helicopters being operated under European air traffic control, the applicable airspace requirements include the Single European Sky legislation.

ED Decision 2016/015/R

AIRCRAFT ELIGIBILITY FOR PBN SPECIFICATION NOT REQUIRING SPECIFIC APPROVAL

(a)The performance of the aircraft is usually stated in the AFM.

(b)Where such a reference cannot be found in the AFM, other information provided by the aircraft manufacturer as TC holder, the STC holder or the design organisation having a privilege to approve minor changes may be considered.

(c)The following documents are considered acceptable sources of information:

(1)AFM, supplements thereto, and documents directly referenced in the AFM;

(2)FCOM or similar document;

(3)Service Bulletin or Service Letter issued by the TC holder or STC holder;

(4)approved design data or data issued in support of a design change approval;

(5)any other formal document issued by the TC or STC holders stating compliance with PBN specifications, AMC, Advisory Circulars (AC) or similar documents issued by the State of Design; and

(6)written evidence obtained from the State of Design.

(d)Equipment qualification data, in itself, is not sufficient to assess the PBN capabilities of the aircraft, since the latter depend on installation and integration.

(e)As some PBN equipment and installations may have been certified prior to the publication of the PBN Manual and the adoption of its terminology for the navigation specifications, it is not always possible to find a clear statement of aircraft PBN capability in the AFM. However, aircraft eligibility for certain PBN specifications can rely on the aircraft performance certified for PBN procedures and routes prior to the publication of the PBN Manual.

(f)Below, various references are listed which may be found in the AFM or other acceptable documents (see listing above) in order to consider the aircraft’s eligibility for a specific PBN specification if the specific term is not used.

(g)RNAV 5

(1)If a statement of compliance with any of the following specifications or standards is found in the acceptable documentation as listed above, the aircraft is eligible for RNAV 5 operations.

(i)B-RNAV;

(ii)RNAV 1;

(iii)RNP APCH;

(iv)RNP 4;

(v)A-RNP;

(vi)AMC 20-4;

(vii)JAA TEMPORARY GUIDANCE MATERIAL, LEAFLET NO. 2 (TGL 2);

(viii)JAA AMJ 20X2;

(ix)FAA AC 20-130A for en route operations;

(x)FAA AC 20-138 for en route operations; and

(xi)FAA AC 90-96.

(h)RNAV 1/RNAV 2

(1)If a statement of compliance with any of the following specifications or standards is found in the acceptable documentation as listed above, the aircraft is eligible for RNAV 1/RNAV 2 operations.

(i)RNAV 1;

(ii)PRNAV;

(iii)US RNAV type A;

(iv)FAA AC 20-138 for the appropriate navigation specification;

(v)FAA AC 90-100A;

(vi)JAA TEMPORARY GUIDANCE MATERIAL, LEAFLET NO. 10 Rev1 (TGL 10); and

(vii)FAA AC 90-100.

(2)However, if position determination is exclusively computed based on VOR-DME, the aircraft is not eligible for RNAV 1/RNAV 2 operations.

(i)RNP 1/RNP 2 continental

(1)If a statement of compliance with any of the following specifications or standards is found in the acceptable documentation as listed above, the aircraft is eligible for RNP 1/RNP 2 continental operations.

(i)A-RNP;

(ii)FAA AC 20-138 for the appropriate navigation specification; and

(iii)FAA AC 90-105.

(2)Alternatively, if a statement of compliance with any of the following specifications or standards is found in the acceptable documentation as listed above and position determination is primarily based on GNSS, the aircraft is eligible for RNP 1/RNP 2 continental operations. However, in these cases, loss of GNSS implies loss of RNP 1/RNP 2 capability.

(i)JAA TEMPORARY GUIDANCE MATERIAL, LEAFLET NO. 10 (TGL 10) (any revision); and

(ii)FAA AC 90-100.

(j)RNP APCH — LNAV minima

(1)If a statement of compliance with any of the following specifications or standards is found in the acceptable documentation as listed above, the aircraft is eligible for RNP APCH — LNAV operations.

(i)A-RNP;

(ii)AMC 20-27;

(iii)AMC 20-28;

(iv)FAA AC 20-138 for the appropriate navigation specification; and

(v)FAA AC 90-105 for the appropriate navigation specification.

(2)Alternatively, if a statement of compliance with RNP 0.3 GNSS approaches in accordance with any of the following specifications or standards is found in the acceptable documentation as listed above, the aircraft is eligible for RNP APCH — LNAV operations. Any limitation such as ‘within the US National Airspace’ may be ignored since RNP APCH procedures are assumed to meet the same ICAO criteria around the world.

(i)JAA TEMPORARY GUIDANCE MATERIAL, LEAFLET NO. 3 (TGL 3);

(ii)AMC 20-4;

(iii)FAA AC 20-130A; and

(iv)FAA AC 20-138.

(k)RNP APCH — LNAV/VNAV minima

(1)If a statement of compliance with any of the following specifications or standards is found in the acceptable documentation as listed above, the aircraft is eligible for RNP APCH — LNAV/VNAV operations.

(i)A-RNP;

(ii)AMC 20-27 with Baro VNAV;

(iii)AMC 20-28;

(iv)FAA AC 20-138; and

(v)FAA AC 90-105 for the appropriate navigation specification.

(2)Alternatively, if a statement of compliance with FAA AC 20-129 is found in the acceptable documentation as listed above, and the aircraft complies with the requirements and limitations of EASA SIB 2014-04⁸⁵, the aircraft is eligible for RNP APCH — LNAV/VNAV operations. Any limitation such as ‘within the US National Airspace’ may be ignored since RNP APCH procedures are assumed to meet the same ICAO criteria around the world.

(l)RNP APCH — LPV minima

(1)If a statement of compliance with any of the following specifications or standards is found in the acceptable documentation as listed above, the aircraft is eligible for RNP APCH — LPV operations.

(i)AMC 20-28;

(ii)FAA AC 20-138 for the appropriate navigation specification; and

(iii)FAA AC 90-107.

(2)For aircraft that have a TAWS Class A installed and do not provide Mode-5 protection on an LPV approach, the DH is limited to 250 ft.

(m)RNAV 10

(1)If a statement of compliance with any of the following specifications or standards is found in the acceptable documentation as listed above, the aircraft is eligible for RNAV 10 operations.

(i)RNP 10;

(ii)FAA AC 20-138 for the appropriate navigation specification;

(iii)AMC 20-12;

(iv)FAA Order 8400.12 (or later revision); and

(v)FAA AC 90-105.

(n)RNP 4

(1)If a statement of compliance with any of the following specifications or standards is found in the acceptable documentation as listed above, the aircraft is eligible for RNP 4 operations.

(i)FAA AC 20-138B or later, for the appropriate navigation specification;

(ii)FAA Order 8400.33; and

(iii)FAA AC 90-105 for the appropriate navigation specification.

(o)RNP 2 oceanic

(1)If a statement of compliance with FAA AC 90-105 for the appropriate navigation specification is found in the acceptable documentation as listed above, the aircraft is eligible for RNP 2 oceanic operations.

(2)If the aircraft has been assessed eligible for RNP 4, the aircraft is eligible for RNP 2 oceanic.

(p)Special features

(1)RF in terminal operations (used in RNP 1 and in the initial segment of the RNP APCH)

(i)If a statement of demonstrated capability to perform an RF leg, certified in accordance with any of the following specifications or standards, is found in the acceptable documentation as listed above, the aircraft is eligible for RF in terminal operations:

(A)AMC 20-26; and

(B)FAA AC 20-138B or later.

(ii)If there is a reference to RF and a reference to compliance with AC 90-105, then the aircraft is eligible for such operations.

(q)Other considerations

(1)In all cases, the limitations in the AFM need to be checked; in particular, the use of AP or FD which can be required to reduce the FTE primarily for RNP APCH, RNAV 1, and RNP 1.

(2)Any limitation such as ‘within the US National Airspace’ may be ignored since RNP APCH procedures are assumed to meet the same ICAO criteria around the world.

ED Decision 2016/015/R

GENERAL

(a)The PBN specifications for which the aircraft complies with the relevant airworthiness criteria are set out in the AFM, together with any limitations to be observed.

(b)Because functional and performance requirements are defined for each navigation specification, an aircraft approved for an RNP specification is not automatically approved for all RNAV specifications. Similarly, an aircraft approved for an RNP or RNAV specification having a stringent accuracy requirement (e.g. RNP 0.3 specification) is not automatically approved for a navigation specification having a less stringent accuracy requirement (e.g. RNP 4).

RNP 4

(c)For RNP 4, at least two LRNSs, capable of navigating to RNP 4, and listed in the AFM, may be operational at the entry point of the RNP 4 airspace. If an item of equipment required for RNP 4 operations is unserviceable, then the flight crew may consider an alternate route or diversion for repairs. For multi-sensor systems, the AFM may permit entry if one GNSS sensor is lost after departure, provided one GNSS and one inertial sensor remain available.

Regulation (EU) No 965/2012

Helicopters shall be equipped with a pressure altitude reporting secondary surveillance radar (SSR) transponder and any other SSR transponder capability required for the route being flown.

ED Decision 2014/015/R

SSR TRANSPONDER

(a)The secondary surveillance radar (SSR) transponders of aircraft being operated under European air traffic control should comply with any applicable Single European Sky legislation.

(b)If the Single European Sky legislation is not applicable, the SSR transponders should operate in accordance with the relevant provisions of Volume IV of ICAO Annex 10.

Regulation (EU) 2016/1199

(a)Aeronautical databases used on certified aircraft system applications shall meet data quality requirements that are adequate for the intended use of the data.

(b)The operator shall ensure the timely distribution and insertion of current and unaltered aeronautical databases to all aircraft that require them.

(c)Notwithstanding any other occurrence reporting requirements as defined in Regulation (EU) No 376/2014, the operator shall report to the database provider instances of erroneous, inconsistent or missing data that might be reasonably expected to constitute a hazard to flight.

In such cases, the operator shall inform flight crew and other personnel concerned, and shall ensure that the affected data is not used.

ED Decision 2017/003/R

AERONAUTICAL DATABASES

When the operator of an aircraft uses an aeronautical database that supports an airborne navigation application as a primary means of navigation used to meet the airspace usage requirements, the database provider should be a Type 2 DAT provider certified in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2017/373 or equivalent.

ED Decision 2017/003/R

AERONAUTICAL DATABASE APPLICATIONS

(a)Applications using aeronautical databases for which Type 2 DAT providers should be certified in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2017/373 may be found in GM1 DAT.OR.100.

(b)The certification of a Type 2 DAT provider in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2017/373 ensures data integrity and compatibility with the certified aircraft application/equipment.

ED Decision 2017/003/R

TIMELY DISTRIBUTION

The operator should distribute current and unaltered aeronautical databases to all aircraft requiring them in accordance with the validity period of the databases or in accordance with a procedure established in the operations manual if no validity period is defined.

ED Decision 2017/003/R

STANDARDS FOR AERONAUTICAL DATABASES AND DAT PROVIDERS

(a)A ‘Type 2 DAT provider’ is an organisation as defined in Article 2(5)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/373.

(b)Equivalent to a certified ‘Type 2 DAT provider’ is defined in any Aviation Safety Agreement between the European Union and a third country, including any Technical Implementation Procedures, or any Working Arrangements between EASA and the competent authority of a third country.