Hi Hanna, SFCL.150 (c) should answer this question with yes.
General Aviation
Public communityPublic - visible to all visitors to the platform.
Open to join - users can join this community without approval.
Invite only - users can only join this community if they are added/invited by community managers.
-
Comment
Jannes NEUMANN commented on Jannes NEUMANN's topic in General Aviation
-
Comment
Zoltán Mészáros commented on Robert Alin Simion's topic in General Aviation
Zoltán Mészáros • 5 years agoAnyway! Why EU making rules, if member states does not follow them? I have a lot of experience from different CAA, different topocs, different rules. Latest from my CAA: PPL exam 202 questions. SPL exam 151 questions. Part FCL/SFCL say 120.
-
Comment
Marius Hubert commented on Joana Verdera's topic in General Aviation
Marius Hubert • 5 years agoI personally use cosyra (cosyra.de) for FTA, which is kinda old and non commercial. Anyway it does the job for me. I have no real experience with acquiring a Type Certificate yet. But I would guess the tool doesn't matter, since you deliver the FTA as a formal prove of the failure/reliability probability for a respective DAL level, which ultimately is just mathematical construct independent of the tool used. I would expect the EASA inspectors to be able to recalculate and check the failure probabilities of your FTA against your denoted probability anyway, since all correct tools result in the same right probability.
-
John FRANKLIN created a topic in General Aviation
-
Jean-Claude Ribaux posted in General Aviation
5 years ago PublicNPA 2020 / 14
Electric & Piston engine aircraft within SEP class rating
Why not? that is a good thing but with the philosophy to be better simpler, EASA is going wrong with the proposal for SEP revalidation
It is absolutely not necessary to request a minimum of flight hours on each propulsion.
Still acting as FI I have now some experience in basic training and I can assure you there are no difference between a piston or an electric aircraft, but the autonomy, but the problem is the same with low fuel on a piston aircraft
Only a ground technical refresher would be suitable and that is what most Flying clubs or school are doing.
So why making things more complicate ?
-
John FRANKLIN created a topic in General Aviation
-
Dimitri Belkin created a topic in General Aviation
-
Paul Bellard posted in General Aviation
5 years ago PublicHi! I have been awaiting details of the BIR Syllabus and module content. I understood from the "Season Opener" it would be posted by now. Does anyone have any information? Perhaps I am looking in the wrong place?
-
Robert Alin Simion created a topic in General Aviation
-
Karel Abbenes posted in General Aviation
5 years ago PublicBASA agreement entering into force June 20th 2021
Some countries have already postponed the introduction (for the last time) to June 20th 2022. I was wondering whether the consequences are clear to all N registered plane owners and pilots in the EU.
Questions remain for some owners:
- Is the maintenance of the N registered aircraft based in the EU governed by the FAA rules and regulations or by EASA rules?
- Is it permitted to fly an N registered aircraft based in the EU with a FAA certificate with a Class 3 medical and a LAPL (A) with a LAPL medical in the EU? I assume a Basic Med is not an option?
- Can you fly the N aircraft based in the EU to the UK with a LAPL medical?
- Are the same rules for maintenance and LAPL licence and medical applicable for G registered aircraft?