Thanks a lot for your comments! I will of course risk assess the LVTO RVR 125 m operation.
Join your community
Join a community to be part of the discussion.
Michel MASSON created a topic in Rotorcraft
John FRANKLIN created a topic in Air Operations
Michel MASSON created a topic in General Aviation
Michel MASSON created a topic in General Aviation
Michel MASSON created a topic in Rotorcraft
Vasileios PAPAGEORGIOU created a topic in Cybersecurity
Michel MASSON created a topic in Rotorcraft
Michel MASSON created a topic in General Aviation
Vasileios PAPAGEORGIOU created a topic in Cybersecurity
Goncalo Oliveira commented on a post in Air Operations
Goncalo Oliveira
1 month ago
Public
Hello Air Operations community,
I'm wondering if you can help me..
Does a CAT operator, applying for an LVTO RVR 125 m approval, needs a risk assessment as per SPA.LVO.105 (g) and AMC2 SPA.LVO.105(g)?
Ricardo Pardo commented on a post in General Aviation
Heinz Falkner
1 month ago
Public
Hi everyone, I’m Heinrich from Austria. I’ve been flying for many years and these days I enjoy taking my Piper PA-28 up for leisure flights around the Alps. Happy to be here and looking forward to chatting with fellow aviation enthusiasts."
Welcome, Heinz!
Heinz Falkner posted in General Aviation
1 month ago
Public
Hi everyone, I’m Heinrich from Austria. I’ve been flying for many years and these days I enjoy taking my Piper PA-28 up for leisure flights around the Alps. Happy to be here and looking forward to chatting with fellow aviation enthusiasts."
Dee Arthur Zubizarreta created a topic in General Aviation
Goncalo Oliveira posted in Air Operations
1 month ago
Public
Hello Air Operations community,
I'm wondering if you can help me..
Does a CAT operator, applying for an LVTO RVR 125 m approval, needs a risk assessment as per SPA.LVO.105 (g) and AMC2 SPA.LVO.105(g)?
Michel MASSON created a topic in Rotorcraft
Michel MASSON created a topic in General Aviation
Michel MASSON created a topic in General Aviation
naila shahhuseynova commented on Vasileios PAPAGEORGIOU's topic in Cybersecurity
has reached the “Present”, “Suitable” and “Operating”
implementation levels 🙄. How frequently organization have to arrange audits during implementation of mentioned levels?
Nikolaos Stamatelatos commented on a post in Cybersecurity
Ian Yell
1 month ago
Public
How do we define the Scope of applicability for Part-IS under a Part-145 maintenance approval? How top level, or deep dive level should we be going - where does it end?. I feel this has the potential to become a huge administrative burden?
I think the scope of Part-IS is not about covering every digital asset but those IT systems, processes, and records that, if compromised, could affect aviation safety — mainly maintenance IT platforms, airworthiness data, and connected tooling/software. The boundary is set by whether a breach could cause or contribute to a safety outcome, not by every office system. What is specific to Part-145 versus other organizations is its heavy dependency on design and CAMO data, the criticality of maintenance records, subcontracted workshops and IT vendors, and in some cases direct interaction with aircraft systems — all of which must be explicitly considered. In practice, I should define the ISMS scope at the level of approved maintenance activities and their safety-critical interfaces, otherwise the administrative burden becomes unmanageable.
Jozef Jankovic commented on Trevor Sexton's topic in General Aviation
Dear friends,
can you share any experience and news in this topic?
It is still very important as the number of pilots using non-EASA but national light aircraft is still growing...