Tatu Koiranen commented on Jorge Martinez's topic in General Aviation
There is still difference about carrying a document and having some document available or accessible during the flight.
For example, you have to carry certificate of registration, but you don't need to have access to it during the flight. AFM or POH or whatever the equivalent document must be carried on-board, but it doesn't have to be accessible during the flight, if the information in point (b) is accessible during the flight.
Davide Michelazzo posted in General Aviation
Good morning all,
modular CPL cadet. Has He/She to attend the advanced UPRT before the CPL skill test?
Julian Scarfe commented on Robert Gottwald's topic in General Aviation
ICAO Annex 1 only deals with Instrument Flight Time. Under JAR-FCL1, some pre-requisites based on Flight Time under IFR was introduced. In some states this caused issues, because there had never been a requirement to record Flight Time under IFR. The UK addressed this by adopting a conversion rate of 4 hours Flight Time under IFR for every 1 hour of Instrument Flight Time, which was acceptable in JAR-FCL days, but was not deemed to be an acceptable means of compliance under Part-FCL. Since Part-FCL has been applicable, logging of flight time under IFR is required.
Nika Khvedelidze posted in General Aviation
Good morning everyone!
As Commission Regulation (EU) No 965/2012 defines by the NCO.GEN.140 Transport of dangerous goods (b)(3) "Dangerous goods shall only be transported by the operator approved in accordance with Annex V (Part-SPA), Subpart G, to Regulation (EU) No 965/2012 except when they are carried by operators of ELA2 aircraft."
This article creates derogation for transporting DG without SPA (DG) Approval. I think the reason is obvious that obtaining such approval for ELA2 aircraft operators is hard to reach and NCO operators (mostly pilots) can not comply with those requirements in full scale.
Unfortunately, there is no guidance material for this topic that defines the purpose of such an approach apart from the ICAO, which obliges all kinds of operators to hold relevant DG approval from the CAA.
If you have any comments or clarifications regarding this subject or have guidance material developed by the EASA or relevant authority of the Member States, any of them would be appreciated.
Thank you!
Kind regards,
Nika Khvedelidze
John Franklin created a topic in General Aviation
Vladimir FOLTIN created an event in General Aviation
Vladimir FOLTIN commented on Vladimir Foltin's event in General Aviation
The recording of the event and the presentation are now available:
https://www.austrocontrol.at/piloten/season_opener
Nuno Moisés commented on Volker Löschhorn's topic in General Aviation
Check AIS.TR.300 General – Aeronautical information products - "Aeronautical information products intended for distribution shall include English text for those parts expressed in plain language, except those products intended to be distributed solely within a Member State."
You may also want to check EUROCONTROL's OPADD "NOTAM intended for international distribution shall include English text for those parts expressed in plain language."
Enjoy
Volker Löschhorn created a topic in General Aviation
Robert Gottwald created a topic in General Aviation
