General Aviation

Good Afternoon everybody,

I kindly request your advice in the following topic / question:

our company provides airport services in the field of aircraft cabin cleaning / cabin dressing services, technical washes, Walkboarding assistance, on-airport crew transportation.

ADR.OPS.B.024 regulates the authorisation of vehicle drivers. Drivers operating vehicles in "manovering areas" need to demonstrate specific language proficieny. Drivers operation vehicels in other areas are not mandated to demonstrate specific language skills.

Commonly airport operators offer the "general driver training programme" in local language and English only. It would be very helpful if airport operators were to offer - at least the theoretical / written driver's test - in other languages, e.g. Turkish, Greek, Spanish, etc. Preferably of course the whole training programme in additional languages.

Would this be allowed under EASA regulations? Are there other limiting factors to this topic?

Thank you very much in advance
Kind regards,
Klaus

Hello Everyone

I wanted to check for your comments and advice regarding the following.
What is the difference between a CRI and a CAI?
Thank you very much in advance
Kind regards
Denitsa

Dear Community, would anybody know where I can find the specific provisions that describe the privileges of a Part-FCL licence holder to pilot aircraft registered in *any* EASA member state (as opposed to *only* aircraft registered in the member state that issued the licence)? For example, that as a holder of a French-issued licence, I could fly an aircraft registered in Italy. I am not able to find any wording to that effect in Annex I (Part-FCL) of the Easy Access Rules for Aircrew (Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011) nor any other regulations. Thank you.

FAAST Nov. 2022 Issue - CFIT and Plan Continuation Bias
https://medium.com/faa/cfit-and-plan-continuation-bias-8dd4afba4ff2

Resist Get-There-Itis bias!

Research conducted by the General Aviation Joint Safety Committee’s (GAJSC) Controlled Flight into Terrain (CFIT) work group report suggests that human bias — particularly plan continuation bias — may be a significant factor in CFIT accidents. It’s important for pilots to know how these human biases could negatively influence pilot decision-making, as well as learn how to more effectively manage things that we can control and plan for those that are beyond our control.

Here an interesting document in case any one is interested.

https://www.easa.europa.eu/en/document-library/product-certification-co…