The AMO responsibility for AD compliance on released A/C is rather limited to cases where discovered A/C configuration in the mainained systems/zones is not in compliance with AD requirements. So it is rather concerning modification than inspection ADs. Some inspection ADs with interval shorter than maintenance time could be also the case.
Anyway AMO is obliged to assure its personnel awarness on ADs touching its scope of work.
Air Operations
Public communityPublic - visible to all visitors to the platform.
Open to join - users can join this community without approval.
Invite only - users can only join this community if they are added/invited by community managers.
-
Michel MASSON posted in Air Operations
1 year ago PublicEASA Airsight Aerodrome "Triple One" Concept: reducing runway incursions — final dissemination event
September 27, 2024, Berlin, Germany, On-site
Organised by EASA and Airsight
Registration: Please contact TripleOne@airsight.de to receive an invitation (pre-register for this event will close by end of July)
Related domains: Aerodromes Research & Innovationhttps://www.easa.europa.eu/en/newsroom-and-events/events/aerodrome-trip…
The Final dissemination event of the EASA project "Triple One" contracted to Airsight will provide an overview of the research scope, objectives, how we carried out the research actions, how we involved stakeholders. The key results and how we plan to make the best use of them will also be presented.
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon Europe Research and Innovation Programme.
More information on this event is provided here:
https://www.airsight.de/company/news/item/easa-triple-one-concept-study…. -
Michel MASSON created a topic in Air Operations
-
marianna montefusco posted in Air Operations
1 year ago PublicHello, do you know if, in EASA/EU Environment, operators may request to limit the availability of real-time ADS-B position and identification information for a specific aircraft for privacy concerns.
In USA this is possible as per following link
https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/technology/equipadsb/privacyThank you very, nice day
-
Konstantin Stoyanov posted in Air Operations
1 year ago PublicHello everyone,
I recently had a discussion with our CAMO regarding original documents to be carried on board of the aircraft. The issue is with CofA or airworthiness certificate we do have the original on board but we have only copy of the ARC in CAT.GEN.MPA.180 ARC is not mentioned at all but i.a.w. 1321/2004 CofA is not valid without ARC. Could you please give me some hints where to look for conformation....
Regards Costa -
Terje Fjerdingen posted in Air Operations
1 year ago PublicCan anyone tell me where I can find a regulatory text giving me the opportunity to combine information that appears in multiple manuals into one separate manual? I have prepared a Managment System Manual containing all common information given in OM-A and CAMO, as org charts etc, to avoid redundancy of information. But CAA-X CAMO insists that this shall be outlined in the CAME specifically because some user guides says so. Can anyone guide me here?
-
Nuno Silva posted in Air Operations
1 year ago PublicHello I'm an air traffic controller and assessor, need to know if there's any regulation reference blockage of runway winds indication on a valid system to mitigate runway incursions. Thanks
-
Comment
Arkadiusz Lisek commented on Mohamed Ali's topic in Air Operations
-
Marko Vidan posted in Air Operations
1 year ago PublicHi,
I have question regarding FCL.915.SFI SFI-Prerequisites.
As stated, there are listed items that candidate shall meet. My question is, are these prerequisites applicable before START of TRAINING or they must be met before START of APPLICATION.
For example, SFI candidate must have 2 LOFT sessions. Can we start training for SFI before he performed 2 LOFT sessions? And then he performs it after training before CAA application?Thank you.
-
Roger van der Velden posted in Air Operations
1 year ago PublicRecently (EU) 2024/1111 was published. In Annex VII it introduces a new Annex IV to regulation (EU) No 965/2012: Part-IAM. In subpart A of this part, all article titles start with the the prefix "IAM", which is logical .
However, in Subparts B, C and S, the prefix suddenly has changed to "UAM". So far, in no other regulation there is a change in the prefix. Is this UAM prefix an error and should it be IAM? or else what does UAM stand for?
Thank you for explaining this.
Best Regards
Roger van der Velden -
Mohamed Ali created a topic in Air Operations