Regular and continual assessment of engineering skills are essential to ensure both best practice and safety when working on AGL equipment. The keeping of personal logbooks ensures that the training needs of the individual are being maintained, and auditing can ensure this. This, with regular updates on technology and regulatory factors, as well as independent assessments on a regular basis, will ensure that AGL engineering personnel are capable of working safely and effectively to ensure compliance on an airfield.
-
John Franklin created a topic in Air Operations
-
John Franklin created a topic in Air Operations
-
Nicolas CHARLEMAGNE posted in Air Operations
5 months ago PublicHi All
I would like and appreciate your comments about one small bit of AMC1 ORO.FC.105(b)(2);(c) Designation as pilot-incommand/commander.
Sorry if the topic has already been addressed in the past. I just could not find the thread.The little bit I am talking about is down the AMC at
(b) Aerodrome knowledge......
(3) All aerodromes to which an operator operates should be categorised in one
of these three categories:
(i) category A —
(A) a straight-in3D i nstrument approach procedure with a glide path angle
of not more than 3.5 degrees to each runway expected to be used for
landing;How do you read and understand the terms " each runway expected to be used for landing" ?
Lets say my airport has a 13/31 Runway . Runway 31 is "equipped" with a straight-in3D instrument approach procedure with a glide path angle of not more than 3.5 degrees. That is the runway which is used 350 days per year. That is the one I expect to use for landing. The other runway,RWY 13, has no instrument approach whatsoever. It is "open" only a few days per year and thus I do not expect to use it .
I know I am tickling the semantic there. But I d like to be sure in assigning this airport to Category A or B.
Sorry for the length of this topic . Looking formward to reading your point of view. -
Hamad Ahmed posted in Air Operations
5 months ago PublicHi All, I am looking for a sample risk assessment as mentioned in SPA.LVO.105 Specific approval criteria (g):
for the intended operations, a safety assessment has been carried out, and performance indicators have been established to monitor the level of safety. -
Dominique Piepers posted in Air Operations
5 months ago PublicHi all,
I am looking for clarification concerning AMC5 CAT.OP.MPA.182 Point (a) (2) (ii) states that "for a type A or a circling approach, ceiling at or above MDH". I don't see why the circling approach has to be separately mentioned since by definition a circling approach is a Type A operation (item (20a) in Annex I - Definitions) -
-
Iry Razafintsalama created a topic in Air Operations
-
Mohammad Ghashghaei created a topic in Air Operations
-
Mohammad Ghashghaei created a topic in Air Operations
-
John Franklin created a topic in Air Operations