That's a great idea! However, and in line with EASA's nomenclature, could you name it "Airworthiness", as it would then cover initial and continued, including P21, P145, CAO, CAMO, P66, P147 ?
Join your community
Join a community to be part of the discussion.
Daniel Saraiva commented on a post in Air Operations
Marcus Merz
4 years ago
Public
Unfortunately there is no own community for CAMO/Part-M topics (yet) which is why i ask here on this topic:
How do you account for CAMO.A.305 (g) and AMC1 CAMO.A.305 (g) in your manuals, i.e. how detailed do you describe the assessment of competency with regards to safety management and human factors especially for staff? Do you rely on subcontractors safety training?
From my point of view this is part of the Management System Continuous Training and will be covered when somebody joins the company (initial) and then as refresher courses i.a.w. AMC3 CAMO.A.305 (g)
humrv7@gmail.com commented on a post in General Aviation
Michel MASSON
4 years ago
Public
FAASTeam Angle of Attack Awareness, April 2021
https://medium.com/faa/angle-of-attack-awareness-cb6dd739c10c
A lack of awareness, with respect to angle of attack (AOA), has resulted in the loss of aircraft control and contributed to fatal GA accidents. Increasing your awareness of the aerodynamic effects of AOA and available technology will help reduce the likelihood of inadvertent loss of control.
Always worth reminding and remembering.
See also the EGAST Leaflet GA 8 and other relevant sources.
Fly safely and have fun!
John FRANKLIN created a topic in Rotorcraft
Peter Holt commented on a post in General Aviation
Jürgen Leukefeld
4 years ago
Public
This might be off-Topic in GA-Community but ...
Did any of you ever use CRT for commenting NPA?
I tried today ...
... I´m registered to use
... ... I was logged in
When klicking to "documents" the page page showed me "logged off"
Does anybody know what went wrong?
Tried using W7, W10, Explorer, Firefox
Thanks for advice though anyway it will be too late to comment NPA 2020-14
Jürgen
The website is horrible.
Also the emails which EASA send out, drawing attention to new documents, don't contain a link to the document, so one has to go to the general website and try to find it. Or try googling for it... but google finds many versions of any EASA document (which is actually another whole issue; one cannot tell which EASA document is current).
Peter Holt commented on a post in General Aviation
Peter Holt
4 years ago
Public
Has the phrase "Not life-limited, nor part of the primary structure, nor part of the flight controls" been clarified as to exact scope?
This suggests autopilot servos are NOT a part of the flight controls.
Michel MASSON posted in General Aviation
4 years ago
Public
FAASTeam Angle of Attack Awareness, April 2021
https://medium.com/faa/angle-of-attack-awareness-cb6dd739c10c
A lack of awareness, with respect to angle of attack (AOA), has resulted in the loss of aircraft control and contributed to fatal GA accidents. Increasing your awareness of the aerodynamic effects of AOA and available technology will help reduce the likelihood of inadvertent loss of control.
Always worth reminding and remembering.
See also the EGAST Leaflet GA 8 and other relevant sources.
Fly safely and have fun!
Marcus Merz posted in Air Operations
4 years ago
Public
Unfortunately there is no own community for CAMO/Part-M topics (yet) which is why i ask here on this topic:
How do you account for CAMO.A.305 (g) and AMC1 CAMO.A.305 (g) in your manuals, i.e. how detailed do you describe the assessment of competency with regards to safety management and human factors especially for staff? Do you rely on subcontractors safety training?
From my point of view this is part of the Management System Continuous Training and will be covered when somebody joins the company (initial) and then as refresher courses i.a.w. AMC3 CAMO.A.305 (g)
Peter Holt posted in General Aviation
4 years ago
Public
Has the phrase "Not life-limited, nor part of the primary structure, nor part of the flight controls" been clarified as to exact scope?
Peter Holt commented on a post in General Aviation
Florian Bittner
4 years ago
Public
Crossing the alps on a sunny day
One could do flights at any time provided one did not land away :) This is a recent one over the Alps, but it was long because it had to go all the way from the UK...
John FRANKLIN created an event in General Aviation
Phil Mountain commented on John FRANKLIN's topic in Air Operations
Hi Jurgen,
AS part of a proactive airline WHM risk reduction program Birdstrike Management Ltd staff have carried out over 190 WHM Standards Checks across Europe since 2009, evidencing the need to provide additional guidance on good practice. Until good practice is the norm, it remains important to provide such guidance to enable all airports to develop their WHM provision to acceptable levels. Efficacy can be measured by how the WHM Plan has been developed and implemented; evidenced by a robust documentation process describing in detail the efforts of the WHM team during all operational hours.
Florian Bittner posted in General Aviation
4 years ago
Public
Crossing the alps on a sunny day
Andriy Kostyuk commented on Pablo Dezontini's topic in Air Operations
Hi !
Here is useful article:
https://www.skybrary.aero/index.php/Precautionary_Rapid_Disembarkation
John FRANKLIN posted in Rotorcraft
4 years ago
Public
Check out the latest news from EASA and EHA on our news page here:
https://www.easa.europa.eu/community/content/latest-rotorcraft-news-apr…
Pablo Dezontini created a topic in Air Operations
Stanko Ivan Misetic commented on a post in Air Operations
Pablo Dezontini
4 years ago
Public
Takeoff Alternate (TALT) calculations:
NCC.OP.150 Takeoff Alternate aerodromes - aeroplanes
How Flight Engineering Operations and Dispatcher should calculate this One (01) Hour distance? Consider the One-engine Inoperative (OEI) Climb? Consider the OEI 100ft/min Max ceiling? How about the Thrust Regime (LRC??) Consider the average or real Cruise Temperature (ISA + 15 for example), consider the descent profile? The MTOW or the ATOW? How about Anti-icing Systems, PACKs air flow (Low, High, AUTO), Ice Accretion, etc? Consider cruise wind, etc?
I guess it depends on how you look at it: this requirement just defines “how far” an alternate can be - Operators are still required to do precise performance calculations for actually going to the alternate.
Pablo Dezontini commented on a post in Air Operations
John FRANKLIN
4 years ago
Public
Registration is now open for our SAFE360 virtual event - it's free at the link here: https://www.easa.europa.eu/newsroom-and-events/events/safe-360deg-safet…
Can't wait for it. Really nice and excellent initiative.
John FRANKLIN posted in Air Operations
4 years ago
Public
Registration is now open for our SAFE360 virtual event - it's free at the link here: https://www.easa.europa.eu/newsroom-and-events/events/safe-360deg-safet…
Pablo Dezontini posted in Air Operations
4 years ago
Public
Takeoff Alternate (TALT) calculations:
NCC.OP.150 Takeoff Alternate aerodromes - aeroplanes
How Flight Engineering Operations and Dispatcher should calculate this One (01) Hour distance? Consider the One-engine Inoperative (OEI) Climb? Consider the OEI 100ft/min Max ceiling? How about the Thrust Regime (LRC??) Consider the average or real Cruise Temperature (ISA + 15 for example), consider the descent profile? The MTOW or the ATOW? How about Anti-icing Systems, PACKs air flow (Low, High, AUTO), Ice Accretion, etc? Consider cruise wind, etc?
Simon Von Niederhäusern posted in Rotorcraft
4 years ago
Public
Wishing you a very Happy Easter 2021 spent with the ones you love most. Stay safe and well! Your VRM Switzerland-Family