If you’re standing at the gate on a frosty morning watching glycol mist swirl into the air, you might think: “we do this every year, why the big fuss?” As we review reports and data, however, it becomes clear that de-icing and associated topics remain one of the biggest risks to winter operations.
So, in this article (and the video below) we are going to offer a timely reminder on the some of the most important aspects of de-icing. We’ll walk through the why, how, and what to look out for when it comes to de-icing and give you tools to manage cold-weather essentials safely and effectively.
Why Do We De-ice and Anti-ice at All?
The short answer: contamination kills lift. Even a thin layer of frost or snow on an aircraft’s surfaces can:
Disrupt airflow.
Increase drag.
Reduce lift.
Change stall characteristics.
And you won’t necessarily see it from the cockpit. The aircraft might look ready, but accidents continue to highlight that even apparent minor patches of frozen contamination can tip the balance.
Deicing and Anti-Icing: Turning Chemistry Into Safety
Winter operations are a battleground between physics, meteorology, and operational discipline. At its heart lies a simple truth: even a thin film of frost, a dusting of snow, or a glaze of clear ice can turn a serviceable aircraft into a machine incapable of flight. The Clean Aircraft Concept demands a spotless wing, but reality demands more than ideals. To bridge the gap, aviation turns to engineered fluids, meticulous procedures, and sharp crew judgment.
The Fluids – Four Families, Different Purposes
Type I – The Quick Fighter
Orange, thin, and always applied hot, Type I fluid is the frontline soldier of winter ops. It is a Newtonian fluid—its viscosity doesn’t change under shear—meaning it flows easily off the wing under gravity. Heated and sprayed at high pressure, it blasts snow and ice off the airframe. For anti-icing, its strength lies in residual warmth left in the structure, not in its chemistry.
But its protection is short-lived. Taxi delays, long queues, or moderate precipitation can overwhelm it. In practice, Type I is best in light conditions, short taxi times, and when the crew is confident of departing quickly.
Type II and IV – The Shield Bearers
Straw-coloured Type II and green Type IV are non-Newtonian. They contain polymers that thicken at rest but shear-thin under airflow during take-off. This allows them to cling to wings on the ground, then shed cleanly when the aircraft accelerates. They create a physical barrier, absorbing precipitation and preventing adhesion.
Their advantage: longer holdover times (HOTs). This makes them suitable for longer taxi routes, heavy precipitation, and airports with complex de-icing procedures.
But there is a trade-off. Fluids can accumulate in aerodynamically quiet zones, dry out, and later rehydrate into a gel when exposed to for example rain. Some operators have reported cabin smells and control difficulties due to fluid residues. Thus, “always using thickened fluids” isn’t necessarily the best solution, it’s about matching fluid to scenario.
Type III – The Middle Child
Rarely mentioned for use on heavy aeroplanes, although designed for smaller regional aircraft with lower rotation speeds. For the operation at SafeWings, it is largely irrelevant.
The Procedures – One Step or Two?
- One-Step Deicing/Anti-Icing: A heated, usually diluted spray removes contamination, while residual fluid (and heat) provides short-lived protection. The catch: the holdover clock starts at the beginning of application. In congested airports, a significant portion of HOT may be used up before the aircraft even leaves the pad.
- Two-Step Deicing/Anti-Icing:
- Step 1: hot Type I (or diluted thickened fluid) removes all contamination.
- Step 2: thickened fluid (II/IV) is applied as a protective coat. Crucially, the holdover time starts at the second step. This maximises the “practical HOT” and is often the smarter choice in heavy conditions or long taxi scenarios.
The decision between one-step and two-step is operational: it weighs treatment time, taxi duration, ATC delays, and precipitation intensity. Crews must think ahead, “Will I still be within HOT at the runway threshold?”—not just “Is the aircraft clean right now?”
Fluid Failures – When Protection Disappears
No fluid lasts forever. Failure occurs when precipitation dilutes the fluid beyond its design limit. Signs include:
Fluid losing its glossy, transparent look, turning opaque.
Inability to see rivets, seams, or surface features beneath.
Embedded contaminants appearing to “sit” in the fluid film.
Failure can look different depending on the contaminant: drizzle, freezing fog, or freezing rain each leave different visual cues. This is why lighting, angles, and vigilance matter. And when in doubt? Tactile checks and/or re-treatment are mandatory. Assumption is the enemy of safety.
LOUT – The Cold Barrier
Every fluid has a Lowest Operational Use Temperature (LOUT). Below this, it cannot provide protection, either because it thickens too much to shear off or because it reaches its freezing point.
- For Type I, LOUT is freezing point + 10°C.
- For Type II/IV, it’s freezing point + 7°C.
Operationally, if fuel temperature is colder than OAT, the lower (colder) value must be used to validate LOUT. Failure to do this can have dangerous consequences.
Case Study
An aircraft was treated at with Type I 30/70 mix based on OAT (+1°C), but the fuel was –6°C. The true LOUT wasn’t respected. Result: residual frozen fluid remained on wings post-flight. The error lay in referencing OAT instead of fuel temp, proving again that fluids are chemistry bound by physics, not paperwork.
Holdover Times (HOT): What You Really Need to Understand
HOT are a window, not a Guarantee. HOT defines the expected protection window, but it is guidance, not a promise.
Factors influencing HOT include:
Precipitation type & intensity (snow absorbs less than freezing rain).
OAT & wind (lower temps shorten HOT, high winds accelerate fluid run-off).
Aircraft configuration (flaps extended reduce HOT by ~25%).
Surface conditions (smooth metal vs. rough composites).
HOT tables give ranges, e.g. 35–65 mins. Where does reality fall? Often at the shorter end, especially with heavy precipitation, wind, or poor visibility. Crew judgment fills that gap.
What Pilots Need to Do
Know your HOT before leaving the stand.
Understand start/stop triggers:
For a one‑step de‑icing/anti‑icing procedure, the HOT begins at the commencement of de‑icing/anti‑icing.
For a two‑step procedure, the HOT begins at the commencement of the second (anti‑icing) step.
Communicate clearly with ATC if HOT is about to expire.
Make use of de-icing checklists and monitor ground coordination actively.
Speak up if anything seems rushed or unclear.
What Ground Ops Need to Know
Follow fluid application protocols - type, coverage, sequence.
Use communication phrases precisely (e.g., "de-icing complete," "anti-icing complete, HOT begins now").
Confirm contamination removal visually - no guessing.
Don’t be afraid to pause or recheck if weather changes rapidly mid-procedure.
Winter De/Anti-icing: Safety Pillars Summary
🧠 Mindset
Treat every winter departure as a contamination risk. Don't assume "light snow" means low risk - ice hides in plain sight.
👥 People
Train and retrain. Everyone - from loaders to captains - has a role. Encourage flight crews to double-check ground crew calls, and vice versa.
⚙️ Equipment
De-icing trucks, fluid storage temps, hoses and nozzles all degrade with wear. Inspect and maintain regularly.
📋 Compliance
Use the current season’s HOT tables. Outdated tables = invalid safety margins. Follow operator SOPs precisely.
⚠️ Risks
Key threats include:
Late or misjudged HOTs.
Fluid applied incorrectly or incompletely.
Assumed clearance without confirmation.
Communication breakdown between flight crew and ground crew.
📚 Learning
Each de-icing incident helps refine our system. Keep reporting - even near misses.
Occurrence Highlight: When HOT Went Cold
Last winter at our Northern Hub, a Boeing 737 was de-iced with Type I and Type IV fluid. The crew received a HOT of 22 minutes. A short delay during taxi pushed them to the 20-minute mark. No reassessment was requested. The aircraft lined up-but as it rotated, a buildup of residual snow was seen trailing from the wing. Further investigation revealed that there had been light contamination had accumulated at the wing root.
Thankfully, it didn’t impact the aircraft’s performance, but the follow-up investigation found:
A miscommunication between the ground team and crew on exact HOT start time.
An overreliance on a conservative estimate rather than a real-time update.
The weather intensity had increased slightly, reducing the actual HOT without being noticed.
Since then, we’ve introduced:
More frequent HOT reminder checks in ATC channels.
Updated crew/ground checklists with HOT calculation prompts.
A digital HOT countdown tool integrated into our Wingsafe app.
Final Word
Don’t let the glycol mist fool you - this is serious work. Proper de/anti-icing is your lifeline in winter operations. Respect the fluids, respect the clock and keep the mindset sharp. If anything feels unclear-speak up. Better a delay on the ground than a frozen surprise in the air.
Please log in or sign up to comment.