Nevertheless the AD monitoring is the responsibility of the CAMO/operator, and AD status is not one of the maintenance data which is required to be given by the operator to the AMO, some AMO's are requesting the AD status to make sure they're releasing the aircraft serviceable and AIRWORTHY.
What confuses me is ,Easa has publish a policy for CRS issuance and gives the right to AMO to not to issue CRS incase doubt on AD overdue..
Please look at the attachment item (4)
No, it is clearly stated: Since the CRS only certifies that the maintenance ordered by the operator (CAMO) has been performed and released in accordance with Part-145, it does not guarantee that all the continuing airworthiness requirements are met (there may be some missing maintenance that has not been ordered by the operator). This is the responsibility of the operator (CAMO).
Yes,AMO adresses the known incomplete maintenance in CRS,and in cases where operator refuses it ceases the issuance...
But my concern is how maintenanceorganisations-icase of AD overdue -knows operator AD non compliance while it's not responsible to track them?(also in item 4)
Maintenance organizations can't know the overdue AD unless the operator provides them the AD status with an obvious overdue AD.
The incomplete maintenance is the maintenance for which the organization can't do an action on it, that's why the organization has to indicate it in the CRS as an incomplete maintenance.
The AMO responsibility for AD compliance on released A/C is rather limited to cases where discovered A/C configuration in the mainained systems/zones is not in compliance with AD requirements. So it is rather concerning modification than inspection ADs. Some inspection ADs with interval shorter than maintenance time could be also the case.
Anyway AMO is obliged to assure its personnel awarness on ADs touching its scope of work.
The tracking of the AD status is the responsibility of the operator’s CAMO. The AMO is responsible to issue the CRS for the maintenance performed.
Nevertheless the AD monitoring is the responsibility of the CAMO/operator, and AD status is not one of the maintenance data which is required to be given by the operator to the AMO, some AMO's are requesting the AD status to make sure they're releasing the aircraft serviceable and AIRWORTHY.
For CAO organisations, the AMO already possess the AD status since it is the as the CAMO
What confuses me is ,Easa has publish a policy for CRS issuance and gives the right to AMO to not to issue CRS incase doubt on AD overdue..
Please look at the attachment item (4)
No, it is clearly stated: Since the CRS only certifies that the maintenance ordered by the operator (CAMO) has been performed and released in accordance with Part-145, it does not guarantee that all the continuing airworthiness requirements are met (there may be some missing maintenance that has not been ordered by the operator). This is the responsibility of the operator (CAMO).
Missing maintenance could be an AD.
Yes,AMO adresses the known incomplete maintenance in CRS,and in cases where operator refuses it ceases the issuance...
But my concern is how maintenanceorganisations-icase of AD overdue -knows operator AD non compliance while it's not responsible to track them?(also in item 4)
Maintenance organizations can't know the overdue AD unless the operator provides them the AD status with an obvious overdue AD.
The incomplete maintenance is the maintenance for which the organization can't do an action on it, that's why the organization has to indicate it in the CRS as an incomplete maintenance.
The non-compliance in item 4 referes to the defects found during the execution of the maintenance which has been ordered by the operator
The AMO responsibility for AD compliance on released A/C is rather limited to cases where discovered A/C configuration in the mainained systems/zones is not in compliance with AD requirements. So it is rather concerning modification than inspection ADs. Some inspection ADs with interval shorter than maintenance time could be also the case.
Anyway AMO is obliged to assure its personnel awarness on ADs touching its scope of work.
Please log in or sign up to comment.