Hello everybody!

We operate Cessna C550 and C560, and one EASA FSTD is available only. The problem is that this year this EASA FSTD will be retired and no EASA FSTD is going to be available for this fleet.

I would like to know if it is possible to carry out the training in FAA FSTD because no EASA FSTD is available, if EASA can encourage FAA FSTD operators to certify these FSTDs according to EASA, or if training in the aircraft is an option in this situation (for us it is not the best option).

C550/C560 (not XL/XLS) is not a large fleet in Europe but there are dozens of these aircraft operating in Europe, most of them in CAT operation.

Thank you for your cooperation!

Benjamin Hari

Hello Gonzalo,

Here are some points to consider:

1) Using FAA FSTDs for EASA Training

Whether FAA FSTDs can be used for EASA training depends on the regulatory acceptance and equivalency between FAA and EASA standards. EASA might accept FAA-certified FSTDs under certain conditions, but this typically requires a review and approval process.

2) EASA Certification of FAA FSTDs

Encouraging FAA FSTD operators to certify their devices according to EASA standards is a viable option. However, this process can be complex and time-consuming, involving both technical and regulatory compliance. FSTD operators would need to ensure their simulators meet EASA’s specific requirements.

3) Training in Aircraft

Conducting training directly in the aircraft is indeed an option, but it is often less efficient and more costly than simulator training as you already mentioned. It may not be feasible for all aspects of training, especially those requiring simulation of emergency or unusual conditions.

Given that the C550/C560 is not a large fleet in Europe but still has a significant presence, it is important to find a practical solution. I recommend reaching out to EASA directly for guidance and exploring the possibility of collaborating with FAA FSTD operators to meet EASA standards. It is also worthwhile to communicate with other operators of these aircraft types in Europe to potentially collaborate on a solution.

In any case, it is crucial to ensure that the training solution meets all regulatory requirements to maintain safety and compliance standards.

Markus Buensen

Dear Gonzalo,

what you describe is an increasing problem to fleets of aging aircraft types that are not prolieferated too much.
I don't know if it helps, but our partners from GFD (Gesellschaft für Flugzieldarstellung) in Germany, an Airbus subsidiary which is involved in military target demonstration fly Lear 35As and have a very similar problem after CAE transferred the only EASA certified LJ35 simulator to another company which didn't care to regain the EASA certificate. Maybe it is worthwhile traing to contact them and see what they did to overcome the issue (see: https://www.gfd.de/en/). I believe they agreed with the authorities to do a bit of a mix between non-EASA FSTD and aircraft.

Best regards,

Markus

Gonzalo Corral

Hello everybody!

Thank you for your feedback, I appreciate your support.

I understand there is a solution because there are several "legacy" aircraft. The key point here is to find an easier solution and avoid AMoCs and exemptions as much as possible.

Best regards.


Sign up or Log in to join the discussion