Thank you John,
i've read the FAQ, it clarifies partly. The MS is only one part of the overwhelming tasks the smaller companies feel confronted to reply to. That's the outcome of the daily business here...
We should be aware that small NCC Operators really try to fullfill what they interpret of being expected from the NAA and EASA, while working with the rule! But more then once we've heared that they feel treated like CAT Operators, which can not be the goal...
I can still not find the NCC part of 965 is tailored and explained enough to the small Operators. In result the Operators don't see the safety aspect of the 965 but increasing bureaucracy...sorry to say.
-
Axel Wegener commented on Axel Wegener's topic in Air Operations
-
John Franklin created a topic in Air Operations
-
Axel Wegener created a topic in Air Operations
-
John FRANKLIN posted in Air Operations
2 months ago Public#EASA is thrilled to announce the release of the Artificial Intelligence Concept Paper Issue 02: Guidance for Level 1 & 2 Machine Learning Applications. This marks a significant step forward on the EASA #AI Roadmap 2.0.
❓ This latest issue addresses the unique challenges of deploying AI in aviation. It expands on Level 1 AI (Human assistance) applications, deepening the exploration of 'learning assurance,' 'AI explainability,' and 'ethics-based assessment' as foundational concepts of the ‘AI trustworthiness framework’. Moreover, it introduces guidance for Level 2 AI-based systems, giving flesh to the groundbreaking concept of 'human-AI teaming' (HAT) and highlighting the need for new human factors guidance to ensure safe Human-AI Interaction (HAII).
👍A huge thank you to all who have contributed to this important publication that serves as a reference for the entry into the framework consolidation phase of EASA AI Roadmap with the launch of EASA Rulemaking activities on AI.
Let's navigate the future of AI in aviation together!
https://www.easa.europa.eu/en/newsroom-and-events/news/easa-publishes-a…
-
John Franklin created a topic in Air Operations
-
Javier Torre posted in Air Operations
2 months ago PublicEFB Own-ship position for situational awareness with a COTS (GNSS with 12 channels)
Good afternoon all,
I hope you are doing well.
I am reaching out seeking support / feedback related to the requirement from AMC7 SPA.EFB.100(b)(3) and the "adequate number of channels (12 or more)" needed for the use of a COTS (iPad) to display own-ship position for situational awareness.- Since many of you are probably using iPads as EFB: does anyone managed to obtain the information to prove that the iPad has a GNSS receiver with 12 channels or more?
- Are you using an iPad to display own-ship (only for situational awareness) as an operator subject to EASA requirements?
- Did your Authority ask you specifically to show compliance with this 12 channels requirement? (knowing that neither FAA nor TC Canada nor ICAO have this requirement)
- Do you think EASA should update this requirement? -
John Franklin commented on John Franklin's topic in Air Operations
John Franklin • 2 months agoHi All, we did a mini version of this covering all the different helicopter operation types in the summary of the Annual Safety Review 2023. You can find this on the link here: https://www.easa.europa.eu/community/topics/easa-annual-safety-review-h…
We have the full analysis in the Annual Safety Review covering each of the domains with graphs of all the Key Risk Areas.
-
diomiro certaldi commented on diomiro certaldi's topic in Air Operations
diomiro certaldi • 2 months agoThanks Marianna, you answer is very useful and detailed.
-
John Franklin created a topic in Air Operations
-
Axel Wegener commented on Axel Wegener's topic in Air Operations
Axel Wegener • 2 months agoUnderstood so far. By reading the documents again it becomes more clear that CAT.POL.A.210 defines a margin of 35ft (min), whereas for NCC.POL.125 it is only given the 'adequate margin', so not to interpret as an 'add' to the 35ft (from CAT), but being the 'absolute' obstacle clearing distance. With that in mind, it should never and could never be Zero (0) ft!
Maybe the GM2 NCC.POL.125 should make that point more obvious.