Join a community to be part of the discussion.
Vasileios PAPAGEORGIOU created a topic in Cybersecurity
Thomas Hytten commented on Michel Masson's topic in General Aviation
Vladimir, that's a valuable addition! Consulting local pilots is indeed essential. Their firsthand knowledge of the local terrain, weather patterns, and unique operational nuances can provide crucial insights that aren't always available in standard documentation or briefings.
Thanks for the input!
djanibodlovic commented on Vladimir FOLTIN's topic in General Aviation
Thank you for update. The recent GA/UL safety incidents in 9A are clear signs that we need EASA to lead on application and harmonization of regulations. Small airports and helipads included!
Katya K posted in Cybersecurity
Hi everyone. I am glad to join
Stephen Oddy commented on a post in General Aviation
Regarding Integrated course training, I would like to confirm if for SPIC training IR phase, an IRI is required. EASA says " "Student pilot-in-command" (SPIC) means a student pilot acting as pilot-in-command on a flight with an instructor where the latter will only observe the student pilot and shall not influence or control the flight of the aircraft".
If the FI is not allowed to provide training in these flights, is he required to comply with FCL.905.FI FI (h)?
As HT I have many doubts about which kind of instructor FI is required for each phase of the integrated ATPL program. FCL requires:
"4. The course shall comprise:
(a) theoretical knowledge instruction to the ATPL(A) knowledge level;
(b) visual and instrument flying training;
(c) training in MCC for the operation of multi-pilot aeroplanes; and
(d) UPRT in accordance with FCL.745.A unless applicants have already
completed this training course before starting the ATP integrated course."
When it is DUAL training is clear: ""Dual instruction time" means flight time or instrument ground time during which a person is receiving flight instruction from a properly authorised instructor. "
Thank you for any support anyone likes to provide. How a formal question could be addressed to EASA?
FCL.905.FI(h) makes it clear that you have to have the (h) qualification, although not with the full number of hours IFR:
(3) if during an approved training course at an ATO, the FI is providing training in FSTDs or supervising SPIC training flights that take place under IFR, the FI shall have completed at least 50 hours of flight time under IFR after the issuance of the BIR or the IR, of which a maximum of 10 hours may be instrument ground time in an FFS, an FTD 2/3 or an FNPT II,;
Iry Razafintsalama created a topic in Air Operations
Vasileios PAPAGEORGIOU created a topic in Cybersecurity
John Franklin created a topic in Air Operations
Michel Masson created a topic in Rotorcraft
Thapanapat Srimoonsang commented on John FRANKLIN's topic in Air Operations
Hi everyone,
I am curious about the suitability verification for runways that will be used for EFVS 200 operations, as detailed in AMC2 CAT.OP.MPA.312(a)(2). However, I am not familiar with OFZ and VSS.
Can anyone provide detailed guidance on how to verify this information, please?
Note: I have seen that some AIPs provide details on OFZ and VSS, but not every runway or aerodrome has published this information.
Miguel Matthew posted in Air Operations
Dear Community,
I have a question regarding positioning.
A crew member completes a flight and reports off duty at base 'A'. He then goes to the crewhouse at base 'A' and the next day drives home. Two days later, he needs to report again, but this time at his home base 'B' for office duty.
My question is: Is the trip from base 'A' to base 'B' considered travel or positioning (thus duty)? The crew member reports off at point 'A' and then reports back at point 'B' (his home base) two days later. During this period, he goes home and then reports at point 'B'.
Do we need to register how the crew member travels from base 'A' to base 'B' even though he reports off at 'A' (since FTL start when reporting on and end when reporting off)? The main concern is how he travels from 'A' to 'B': in his own time (travel) or as positioning (duty)? The operator requires him at 'B', but he was at point 'A'
Vasileios PAPAGEORGIOU created a topic in Cybersecurity
Michel Masson posted in Air Operations
The May 2024 issue of ERA's Regional International magazine is online!
This digital-only issue, ERA's environmental special, also includes the latest information from ERA, exclusive comments from industry leaders, news from ERA members and this issue sponsor Fokker Next Gen.
The full issue is available to read online or download as a PDF for free.
https://cloud.3dissue.net/9237/9242/9271/112250/index.html?49064&utm_so…
John Franklin created a topic in Air Operations
Andrey Karimov created a topic in Air Operations
Michel Masson created a topic in Air Operations
Michel Masson created a topic in General Aviation
Francisco Molina commented on a post in Air Operations
Dear community,
According to the provisions of GM1 ORO.FC.100(c) , may a pilot with OML restrictions , fly an MPA with another pilot who has no OML restrictions , he is fully qualified to the type, but he is over 60 years old?
Hello Nikolaos. I agree with you. There is no limitation to pair two pilots over 60yo unless that they have an OML (Aircrew MED.B.001(d)(1)(ii)). On my eyes, what Benjamin mentioned is based on the old COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 1178/2011 which has been amended several times (by the COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) 2015/445 and finally the Regulation (EU) 2020/359) which is mentioned in the Aircrew FCL.065). In that FCL point there is no constraint for pairing two pilots over 60yo as long as MED.B.001 is not applicable.
Cheers
JESSIE ARTHORO commented on a post in Cybersecurity
EASA Artificial Intelligence Days - High Level Conference
16 - 17 May
Join us at the EASA Artificial Intelligence (AI) Days where we will pave the way for the future of AI in aviation with the unveiling of the EASA AI Roadmap 2.0.
We will also engage in meaningful discussions with industry leaders and researchers at the MLEAP Stakeholder's Day.
Please share the link below to your contacts it would be great to disseminate this invite as much as possible.
https://www.easa.europa.eu/en/newsroom-and-events/events/easa-artificia…
id be happy to , give me your details so we can share some email to get to know ourselves
